Home > Smartphone comparison > K13 Turbo vs 400 Lite – which one to choose?

Oppo K13 Turbo vs Honor 400 Lite

72 out of 100
Oppo K13 Turbo
VS
58 out of 100
Honor 400 Lite
Oppo K13 Turbo
Honor 400 Lite

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.8-inch Oppo K13 Turbo (with MediaTek Dimensity 8450) that was released on July 21, 2025, against the Honor 400 Lite, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Oppo K13 Turbo
  • 3.1x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1990K versus 635K)
  • Comes with 1770 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 5230 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 35W)
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Stereo speakers
  • 15% higher pixel density (453 vs 394 PPI)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor 400 Lite
  • Water-resistant body (IP65 classification)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Weighs 46 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Oppo K13 Turbo and Honor 400 Lite crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
113.7
(Excellent)
Value Index
25.6
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
K13 Turbo
vs
400 Lite

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.8 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2800 pixels 1080 x 2412 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20.1:9
PPI 453 ppi 394 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 3500 nits
HDR support No No
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection AGC DT-Star D+ Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 89.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display

Design and build

Height 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) 161 mm (6.34 inches)
Width 77.2 mm (3.04 inches) 74.6 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) 7.3 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 207 g (7.3 oz) 161 g (5.68 oz)
Waterproof IPX9 IP65
Advanced cooling Active fan -
Rear material - Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Black, Purple Black, Gray, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.63/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) Β· 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
K13 Turbo
90.3%
400 Lite
89.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Oppo K13 Turbo and Honor 400 Lite
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8450 MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra
Max clock 3250 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725		 - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache 6 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 MediaTek NPU 550
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MP7 IMG BXM-8-256
GPU shading units 896 128
GPU clock 1300 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS ~243.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Oppo K13 Turbo and Honor 400 Lite
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
K13 Turbo +69%
1612
400 Lite
956
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
K13 Turbo +170%
6210
400 Lite
2303
Compute Score (GPU)
K13 Turbo +8516%
12321
400 Lite
143
Compute Score (GPU) 12321 143
Single-core score 1612 956
Multi-core score 6210 2303
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
K13 Turbo +213%
1990099
400 Lite
635368
CPU 624873 236207
GPU 647052 56191
Memory 256266 182963
UX 461908 160007
Total score 1990099 635368
Samples [15 tests] [6 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
K13 Turbo
1467
400 Lite
n/a
Graphics test 11 FPS -
Graphics score 1467 -
3DMark Solar Bay
K13 Turbo
6549
400 Lite
n/a
Graphics test 25 FPS -
Section 1 27 FPS -
Section 2 25 FPS -
Section 3 22 FPS -
Graphics score 6549 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
K13 Turbo +19%
14601
400 Lite
12296
Web score 17107 14361
Video editing 6366 5525
Photo editing 31941 23703
Data manipulation 10037 10873
Writing score 19003 15057
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Oppo K13 Turbo
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 -> AndroSidGeekbench 6 GPU12587
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 -> AndroSidGeekbench 6 CPU1612 / 6210
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 -> AndroSidCPU Throttle90%
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 -> AndroSidAnTuTu 112016976
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 (ALONE EMPEROR)AnTuTu 111925606
Add View all (18)
Honor 400 Lite
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (kilobyte.tech)AnTuTu 12704537
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (Dud)AnTuTu 11658200
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Dud)AnTuTu 11635368
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-26 (Yoi)AnTuTu 11604873
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (ElJavi)AnTuTu 11707759
Add View all (7)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory clock - 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM ColorOS 15 MagicOS 10
OS updates - 2 years
Security updates - 3 years

Battery

Capacity 7000 mAh 5230 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 35 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (63% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 35 min)
Full charging time 0:56 hr 1:25 hr
Battery cycles - 1400 cycles
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 108 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 12000 x 9000
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS No
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion 120 FPS (1080p) -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
1) Standard: 108 MP
2) Ultrawide: 5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 108 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 27 mm -
Sensor - Samsung ISOCELL HM6
Sensor size - 1/1.67" (β‰ˆ 0.6 inch)
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution - 5 MP
Aperture - f/2.2
Stabilization - Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 4920 x 3264 -
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.5
Focal length 22 mm -
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced July 2025 April 2025
Release date July 2025 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $305 $299
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo K13 Turbo is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Related comparisons

1. Honor 400 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
2. Honor 400 Lite vs Honor 400
3. Honor 400 Lite vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
4. Honor 400 Lite vs Honor 200 Lite
5. Honor 400 Lite vs Honor 400 Pro
6. Oppo K13 Turbo vs Realme P4 Pro 5G
7. Oppo K13 Turbo vs Oppo K13 5G (1)
8. Oppo K13 Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
9. Oppo K13 Turbo vs Realme 15 5G (India)
10. Oppo K13 Turbo vs Motorola Moto G86 Power 5G
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский