Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro vs Honor 400 Lite
73
out of 100
VS
58
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra) that was released on January 9, 2025, against the Honor 400 Lite, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
- 3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1930K versus 635K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Optical image stabilization
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 35W)
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Comes with 770 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5230 mAh
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- Stereo speakers
- 13% higher pixel density (446 vs 394 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Honor 400 Lite
- Weighs 34 grams less
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels | 1080 x 2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20.1:9 |
| PPI | 446 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1400 nits | 3500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.8% | 89.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 99.6% | - |
| PWM | 120 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | β Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 160.75 mm (6.33 inches) | 161 mm (6.34 inches) |
| Width | 75.24 mm (2.96 inches) | 74.6 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.29 mm (0.33 inches) | 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Green, Yellow | Black, Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.63/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Very good (B) Β· 180 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Max clock | 3250 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 880 | MediaTek NPU 550 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 MC7 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| GPU shading units | 896 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2329.6 GFLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 12162 | 143 |
| Single-core score | 1573 | 956 |
| Multi-core score | 6102 | 2303 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 621813 | 236207 |
| GPU | 602568 | 56191 |
| Memory | 295421 | 182963 |
| UX | 411049 | 160007 |
| Total score | 1930851 | 635368 |
| Samples | [212 tests] | [6 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 80% | - |
| Graphics test | 10 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1285 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 23 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 24 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 23 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 20 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 5931 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14924 | 14361 |
| Video editing | 6707 | 5525 |
| Photo editing | 23231 | 23703 |
| Data manipulation | 12242 | 10873 |
| Writing score | 18327 | 15057 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-24 (Xann) | AnTuTu 12 | 2143962 |
| π 2026-09-23 (AYS) | AnTuTu 12 | 2192420 |
| π 2026-09-21 (JenKenny) | AnTuTu 11 | 2063774 |
| π 2026-09-20 (POCOMAN) | AnTuTu 12 | 2112771 |
| π 2026-09-16 (Alex) | AnTuTu 11 | 2004654 |
Honor 400 Lite
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-16 (kilobyte.tech) | AnTuTu 12 | 704537 |
| π 2026-08-23 (Dud) | AnTuTu 11 | 658200 |
| π 2026-08-21 (Dud) | AnTuTu 11 | 635368 |
| π 2026-06-26 (Yoi) | AnTuTu 11 | 604873 |
| π 2026-06-20 (ElJavi) | AnTuTu 11 | 707759 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3.0 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS updates | 3 years | 2 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 5230 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 35 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 17 min) | Yes (50% in 35 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:42 hr | 1:25 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1400 cycles |
| Web browsing | 10:29 hr | - |
| Watching video | 15:22 hr | - |
| Gaming | 05:54 hr | - |
| Standby | 93 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 108 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 12000 x 9000 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Ultrawide: 5 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/1.67" (β 0.6 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | - |
| Sensor | Smartsens SC820CS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 5184 x 3888 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV20B | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Depends on the region | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | January 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | January 2025 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $299 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | - |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 0.99 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Poco X7 Pro:
- The eco-leather version is thicker at 8.43 mm and weighs 198 grams.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 74
Related comparisons
10.
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro vs Xiaomi 14T (3)