Oppo Reno 10 5G vs Honor X9b
52
out of 100
VS
55
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.7-inch Oppo Reno 10 5G (with MediaTek Dimensity 7050) that was released on May 24, 2023, against the Honor X9b, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 10 5G
- The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 35W)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- 14% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (802K versus 701K)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- Stereo speakers
Reasons to consider the Honor X9b
- Water-resistant body (IP53 classification)
- Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 5800 vs 5000 mAh
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 2750 MHz
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
- More energy-efficient CPU β Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels | 1200 x 2652 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 394 ppi | 431 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 950 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 91.4% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.43 mm (6.39 inches) | 163.6 mm (6.44 inches) |
| Width | 74.19 mm (2.92 inches) | 75.5 mm (2.97 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.98 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP53 |
| Rear material | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Black, Green, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Max clock | 2600 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 550 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mail-G68 MC4 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 950 MHz | 676 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS | ~346.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| Single-core score | 964 | 936 |
| Multi-core score | 2375 | 2796 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 295016 | 283602 |
| GPU | 80823 | 56029 |
| Memory | 175145 | 154312 |
| UX | 251513 | 207111 |
| Total score | 802497 | 701054 |
| Samples | [5 tests] | [11 tests] |
Recent User Tests
Oppo Reno 10 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-26 (Thun) | AnTuTu 12 | 874833 |
| π 2026-08-16 (MymySupremacy) | AnTuTu 11 | 839005 |
| π 2026-07-18 (Thun) | AnTuTu 11 | 823369 |
| π 2026-06-26 (Ashraff) | AnTuTu 11 | 715685 |
| π 2026-04-10 (SY) | AnTuTu 11 | 782847 |
Honor X9b
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-05-25 (morosov) | AnTuTu 11 | 697980 |
| π 2025-12-25 (Sanechka Sanechek) | AnTuTu 11 | 757614 |
| π 2025-11-28 -> Sgbarnuevo | AnTuTu 11 | 735717 |
| π 2025-11-25 -> Sgbarnuevo | AnTuTu 11 | 653874 |
| π 2025-11-22 (Era) | AnTuTu 11 | 695721 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) |
| ROM | ColorOS 13.1 | Magic UI 8.0 |
| OS updates | 2 years | - |
| Security updates | 4 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 35 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (74% in 30 min) | Yes (80% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:43 hr | 1:57 hr |
| Web browsing | 07:30 hr | - |
| Watching video | 12:17 hr | - |
| Gaming | 05:14 hr | - |
| Standby | 116 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 megapixels | 108 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 9000 x 7000 | 12000 x 9000 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Digital (lossless), 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 112Β° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 64 MP 2) Telephoto: 32 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Ultrawide: 5 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Samsung HM6 |
| Sensor size | 1/2" (β 0.5 inch) | 1/1.67" (β 0.6 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 32 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | - | 2 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 3680 | 3456 x 4608 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | - | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Depends on the region |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 18 | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May 2023 | October 2023 |
| Release date | June 2023 | October 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $380 | $375 |
| Successor | - Oppo Reno 15 | - Honor X9d |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Yes, 35 W |
Further details
Notes on Reno 10 5G:
- UFS 3.1 (512GB 12GB RAM only)
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, battery life, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Honor X9b. But if the gaming, connectivity, and sound are more of a priority β go for the Oppo Reno 10 5G.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 44
Related comparisons
3.
Honor X9b vs Honor X9a (1)
5.
Honor X9b vs Honor 90 (2)