Oppo Reno 12 F 4G vs Reno 11 F 5G
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Oppo Reno 12 F 4G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 685) that was released on July 18, 2024, against the Oppo Reno 11 F 5G, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7050 and came out 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 12 F 4G
- Stereo speakers
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
- 95% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (841K versus 431K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
- Water-resistant body (IP65 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 45W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
- 2.3x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1061 and 470 points
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 395 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 1100 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Panda glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 89.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) | 161.6 mm (6.36 inches) |
| Width | 75.8 mm (2.98 inches) | 74.7 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.76 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.54 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP64 | IP65 |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gray, Green, Orange | Blue, Green, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 |
| Max clock | 2800 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | MediaTek APU 550 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 1260 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~322.6 GFLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 349 | 2381 |
| Single-core score | 470 | 1061 |
| Multi-core score | 1468 | 2398 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 165172 | 302668 |
| GPU | 33427 | 81235 |
| Memory | 106325 | 191087 |
| UX | 126916 | 266507 |
| Total score | 431840 | 841497 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [5 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 97% |
| Graphics test | - | 2 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 242 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10579 | 11753 |
| Video editing | 3990 | 6224 |
| Photo editing | 13123 | 24103 |
| Data manipulation | 6914 | 9090 |
| Writing score | 9240 | 14296 |
Recent User Tests
Oppo Reno 12 F 4G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2024-11-28 (Amit) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 349 |
| π 2024-11-28 (Amit) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 470 / 1468 |
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-29 (Ahmad Raza) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 861 / 1837 |
| π 2026-05-13 (Jozef) | AnTuTu 11 | 841497 |
| π 2026-04-19 (dijee) | AnTuTu 11 | 853912 |
| π 2026-04-17 (Telsh) | AnTuTu 11 | 844424 |
| π 2025-11-14 (Jozef) | AnTuTu 11 | 814173 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | ColorOS 14 | ColorOS 14 |
| OS updates | - | 2 years |
| Security updates | - | 4 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 19 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 0:45 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 64 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 480 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 112Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 64 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 28 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | - | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.0" (β 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 6528 x 3680 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX709 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | - |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | - | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | No |
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | July 2024 | February 2024 |
| Release date | July 2024 | February 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $300 | $299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 67 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Oppo Reno 11 F 5G. But if the camera, battery life, and sound are more of a priority β go for the Oppo Reno 12 F 4G.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 110