Oppo Reno 13 F 5G vs Reno 12 F 4G
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Oppo Reno 13 F 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1) that was released on January 4, 2025, against the Oppo Reno 12 F 4G, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 13 F 5G
- 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (862K versus 431K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
- Optical image stabilization
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 5800 vs 5000 mAh
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
- More energy-efficient CPU β Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
- 2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 930 and 470 points
- The phone is 6 months newer
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 12 F 4G
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 180 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Screen protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.2% | 86.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
Design and build
| Height | 162.2 mm (6.39 inches) | 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) |
| Width | 75.05 mm (2.95 inches) | 75.8 mm (2.98 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.76 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.76 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP64 |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple | Gray, Green, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Good (3.83/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 240 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 710 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 676 MHz | 1260 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~346.1 GFLOPS | ~322.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 349 |
| Single-core score | 930 | 470 |
| Multi-core score | 2643 | 1468 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 332056 | 165172 |
| GPU | 101903 | 33427 |
| Memory | 185599 | 106325 |
| UX | 242454 | 126916 |
| Total score | 862042 | 431840 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 99% | - |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 242 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11934 | 10579 |
| Video editing | 6535 | 3990 |
| Photo editing | 17674 | 13123 |
| Data manipulation | 9110 | 6914 |
| Writing score | 11473 | 9240 |
Recent User Tests
Oppo Reno 13 F 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-26 (Mohamed Hazem) | AnTuTu 12 | 932808 |
| π 2026-09-26 (Mohamed Hazem) | AnTuTu 12 | 932808 |
| π 2026-09-17 (zain) | AnTuTu 11 | 731773 |
| π 2026-05-11 (Hamo) | AnTuTu 11 | 862042 |
| π 2025-10-03 (Marconi2897) | AnTuTu 11 | 749828 |
Oppo Reno 12 F 4G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2024-11-28 (Amit) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 349 |
| π 2024-11-28 (Amit) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 470 / 1468 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | ColorOS 15 | ColorOS 14 |
| OS updates | 2 years | - |
| Security updates | 4 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (44% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Battery cycles | 1600 cycles | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 112Β° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 28 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Stabilization | No | No |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Depends on the region | No |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | - |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | January 2025 | July 2024 |
| Release date | January 2025 | July 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | $300 |
| Successor | - Oppo Reno 15 F | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Reno 13 F 5G is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 16