Home > Smartphone comparison > Reno 14 vs Ace 5 Racing – which one to choose?

Oppo Reno 14 vs OnePlus Ace 5 Racing

72 out of 100
Oppo Reno 14
VS
77 out of 100
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
Oppo Reno 14
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.59-inch Oppo Reno 14 (with MediaTek Dimensity 8350) that was released on May 15, 2025, against the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400e and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 14
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 19% higher pixel density (460 vs 387 PPI)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
  • Comes with 1100 mAh larger battery capacity: 7100 vs 6000 mAh
  • 47% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2536K versus 1724K)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • 71% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2250 and 1319 points

Review

Evaluation of Oppo Reno 14 and OnePlus Ace 5 Racing crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
102.8
(Excellent)
Value Index
102.3
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Reno 14
vs
Ace 5 Racing

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.77 inches
Resolution 1256 x 2760 pixels 1080 x 2392 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 -
PPI 460 ppi 387 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 600 nits 1300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1200 nits -
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Crystal Shield Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 88.8% 89.7%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 157.9 mm (6.22 inches) 163.58 mm (6.44 inches)
Width 74.73 mm (2.94 inches) 76.02 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 7.42 mm (0.29 inches) 8.17 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 200 g (7.05 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP64
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal -
Colors White, Black, Green White, Black, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.74/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 180 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
Reno 14
88.8%
Ace 5 Racing +1%
89.7%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Oppo Reno 14 and OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8350 MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
Max clock 3350 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715		 - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 780 MediaTek NPU 790
GPU
Graphics Mali-G615 MP6 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 768 1536
GPU clock 1400 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Oppo Reno 14 and OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Reno 14
1319
Ace 5 Racing +71%
2250
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Reno 14
4067
Ace 5 Racing +83%
7452
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 8534 -
Single-core score 1319 2250
Multi-core score 4067 7452
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Reno 14
1724757
Ace 5 Racing +47%
2536961
CPU 514672 786460
GPU 480538 833139
Memory 275946 326880
UX 453601 590482
Total score 1724757 2536961
Samples [14 tests] [5 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 58%
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Graphics score - 1855
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 30 FPS
Section 1 - 33 FPS
Section 2 - 30 FPS
Section 3 - 26 FPS
Graphics score - 7859
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Reno 14
n/a
Ace 5 Racing
19671
Web score - 22588
Video editing - 7396
Photo editing - 40623
Data manipulation - 15606
Writing score - 26663
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#140th place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Oppo Reno 14
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (K)AnTuTu 111656870
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (Vishal)AnTuTu 111588535
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-13 (Wal)AnTuTu 111732207
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-28 (Jj_Cnstn)AnTuTu 111743814
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-15 (Gabriel Pereira)AnTuTu 111724757
Add View all (18)
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Zavien)AnTuTu 112343777
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-21 -> retys737AnTuTu 112514414
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-25 (Newa)AnTuTu 112545677
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-20 (Olegn777)AnTuTu 112536961
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-14 (neoneos4zoom)AnTuTu 112559879
Add View all (5)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM ColorOS 15 ColorOS 15
OS updates 6 years -

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 7100 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (75% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:50 hr -
Battery cycles 1600 cycles -
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.5x Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 116Β° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm 26 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/2.8 -
Focal length 80 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.6 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX355 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4608 x 3456
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
Focal length 21 mm 23 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/3" (β‰ˆ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 0.6 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo -
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No -

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced May 2025 May 2025
Release date May 2025 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $400 $250
Successor - Oppo Reno 15 -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, battery life, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing. But if the display and camera are more of a priority – go for the Oppo Reno 14.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total votes: 1

Related comparisons

1. OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro (1)
2. OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs OnePlus Ace 5
3. OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
4. OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
5. Oppo Reno 14 vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro (4)
6. Oppo Reno 14 vs Oppo Reno 14 F 5G
7. Oppo Reno 14 vs Honor 400 (2)
8. Oppo Reno 14 vs Oppo Reno 13 5G (2)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский