Oppo Reno 16 F 5G vs Honor X9e Pro

70 out of 100
Oppo Reno 16 F 5G
VS
73 out of 100
Honor X9e Pro

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.57-inch Oppo Reno 16 F 5G (with MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy) that was released on June 25, 2026, against the Honor X9e Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 16 F 5G
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Honor X9e Pro
  • Comes with 4000 mAh larger battery capacity: 11000 vs 7000 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • 28% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1008K versus 789K)
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5
  • 14% higher pixel density (451 vs 397 PPI)
  • 16% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1174 and 1008 points
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of Oppo Reno 16 F 5G and Honor X9e Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
6 / 256 GB
70.7
(Good)
Value Index
81.1
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.57 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2372 pixels 1280 x 2788 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 397 ppi 451 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1400 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR - 10000 nits
HDR support No Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Crystal Guardd Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 88% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Screen space comparison
X9e Pro
6.8″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.6 in2
Reno 16 F 5G
6.57″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.2 in2
~8% more screen space

Design and build

Height 158.16 mm (6.23 inches) 162.2 mm (6.39 inches)
Width 74.93 mm (2.95 inches) 77 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 8.44 mm (0.33 inches) 8.1 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 195 g (6.88 oz) 203 g (7.16 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Eco-leather
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Purple White, Black, Gold, Purple, Brown
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
X9e Pro +3%
90.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Oppo Reno 16 F 5G and Honor X9e Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5
Max clock 2500 MHz 2600 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache 4 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 655 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G615 MP2 Adreno 812
GPU shading units 256 256
GPU clock 1047 MHz -
FLOPS ~536.1 GFLOPS -

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Oppo Reno 16 F 5G and Honor X9e Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
X9e Pro +16%
1174
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
X9e Pro +21%
3487
Compute Score (GPU)
X9e Pro +72%
4200
Compute Score (GPU) 2443 4200
Single-core score 1008 1174
Multi-core score 2891 3487
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
789658
X9e Pro +28%
1008325
CPU 212573 341959
GPU 206226 215381
Memory 179540 201913
UX 191319 249072
Total score 789658 1008325
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory clock 2133 MHz -
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM ColorOS 16 Magic OS 10
OS updates 3 years -
Security updates 4 years -

Battery

Capacity 7000 mAh 11000 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 1:02 hr -

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 108 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 12000 x 9000
Zoom Optical, 3.5x Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) -
Angle of widest lens 116° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 108 MP
2) Ultrawide: 5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 108 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.7
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor size 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/2.8 -
Focal length 92 mm -
Sensor size 1/3.13" (≈ 0.32 inch) -
Pixel size 0.56 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 16 mm -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 18 mm -
Sensor CMOS -
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) -
Pixel size 0.61 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced June 2026 September 2026
Release date July 2026 October 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $480 $465
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger - Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Honor X9e Pro. It has a better display, performance, gaming, battery life, software, design, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!