Samsung Galaxy A34 5G vs Galaxy A25

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.6-inch Samsung Galaxy A34 5G (with MediaTek Dimensity 1080) that was released on March 14, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy A25, which is powered by Exynos 1280 and came out 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
  • Waterproof body (IP67 classification)
  • Shows 20% longer battery life (22:02 vs 18:26 hours)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
  • 20% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (741K versus 617K)
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • 9% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1047 and 957 points
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A25
  • Delivers 11% higher peak brightness (1027 against 925 nits)
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
  • The phone is 9 months newer

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy A34 5G and Galaxy A25 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 128 GB
112.8
(Excellent)
Value Index
60.1
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Super AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.6 inches 6.5 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 390 ppi 396 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) No
Max rated brightness 1000 nits 1000 nits
HDR support No No
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Screen-to-body ratio 84.9% 84.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 100% 145.1%
PWM 253 Hz 119 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
925 nits
Galaxy A25 +11%
1027 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 161.3 mm (6.35 inches) 161 mm (6.34 inches)
Width 78.1 mm (3.07 inches) 76.5 mm (3.01 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.3 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 199 g (7.02 oz) 197 g (6.95 oz)
Waterproof IP67 No
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black, Silver, Green, Purple Black, Blue, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio
84.9%
84.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy A34 5G and Samsung Galaxy A25
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 1080 Samsung Exynos 1280
Max clock 2600 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 6 nanometers 5 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G68 MP4
GPU shading units 128 128
GPU clock 950 MHz 897 MHz
FLOPS ~243.2 GFLOPS ~229.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy A34 5G and Samsung Galaxy A25
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1047
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
2543
2095
Compute Score (GPU)
2435
2348
Compute Score (GPU) 2435 2348
Single-core score 1047 957
Multi-core score 2543 2095
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
741627
617315
CPU 299339 246621
GPU 79444 71605
Memory 125398 102085
UX 237446 197004
Total score 741627 617315
Samples [31 tests] [22 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 97% 95%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS
Graphics score 238 226
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 3 FPS -
Graphics score 639 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10948 -
Video editing 7467 -
Photo editing 18941 -
Data manipulation 10634 -
Writing score 14594 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-06 (Ano)Geekbench 6 GPU2720
📘 2026-09-06 (Anonymous)Geekbench 6 CPU1020 / 2514
📘 2026-09-04 -> PolarisDeOstianAnTuTu 11780307
📘 2026-09-04 (Polaris)AnTuTu 11780307
📘 2026-08-05 (Thomaz Tescaro)AnTuTu 11788166
Samsung Galaxy A25
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-14 (DJ)AnTuTu 11651423
📘 2026-06-15 (OmPhanLaoRaBien)AnTuTu 11637428
📘 2026-06-02 (MusteryLodall)Geekbench 6 CPU936 / 2053
📘 2026-06-02 (MusteryLodall)AnTuTu 11605286
📘 2026-05-30 (🇻🇳 CuoiLaoXuongSong)AnTuTu 11630054

Memory

RAM
RAM size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14
ROM One UI 8.0 One UI 6
OS size 38 GB 20 GB
OS updates 4 years 2 years
Security updates 5 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 25 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (49% in 30 min) Yes (49% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:55 hr 1:24 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:38 hr 06:44 hr
Watching video 13:33 hr 11:34 hr
Gaming 05:31 hr 04:52 hr
Standby 115 hr 91 hr
General battery life
22:02 hr
18:26 hr

Main camera

Matrix 48 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8000 x 6000 8160 x 6120
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 48 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm 27 mm
Sensor Sony IMX582 Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor Samsung S5K4HAYX Samsung ISOCELL (S5K)4HA
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 5 MP 2 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.4
Sensor GalaxyCore GC5035 GalaxyCore GC02M1
Stabilization Digital No

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 45 -
Preview 48 -
Zoom 76 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy A34 5G from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 13 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 4160 x 3120 4160 x 3120
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX258 Hynix Hi-1339
Sensor size 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot Yes Yes
LTE Cat* - 18
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No Yes
FM radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.4 dB
79.6 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced March 2023 December 2023
Release date March 2023 December 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $390 $299
Successor - Samsung Galaxy A37 5G - Samsung Galaxy A26 5G
SAR (head) 0.55 W/kg 0.46 W/kg
SAR (body) 1.49 W/kg 1.19 W/kg
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, battery life, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G. But if the display and camera are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy A25.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1027 (79.2%)
270 (20.8%)
Total votes: 1297

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Know May 20, 2025 at 09:59 AM
The battery on samsung a25 should be 81%
+2 Reply
Avatar
Peter June 21, 2024 at 12:51 AM
The A34 is better value than the A25. It has an objectively better display, performance and design. Get the a34 as it can regularly be seen at lower prices than the A25.
+23 Reply
Avatar
Bilibad Fouflaz March 23, 2024 at 11:37 PM
The a34 is currently a better price value, but it is still a 3-level phone compared to the 2-level of the s25. The previous reviewer is obviously biased against Exynos. Keep in mind that Samsung having success with Exynos is very damaging to both Snapdragon and Mediatek, and they do employ people to post negative information in an attempt to influence the market. Many people prefer the side-mounted fingerprint scanner because it means you can add a screen protector without the worry of causing issues with your screen's fingerprint scanner. By the way, the battery life test should be redone. The a25's listed battery life is far better than this site lists, based on other testers.
+62 Reply
Avatar
Mohammed Zouheir January 4, 2024 at 08:00 PM
Essentially, the Samsung A25 is not faster than the A34. This is odd for a newer generation phone. The Exynos 1280 is not performing like the Samsung A53, but instead, it's more like the Samsung A33, which is already 2 years old. I've noticed that Samsung is using older parts more often this year than in previous years. Additionally, a phone that costs 999 AED and does not have an on-screen fingerprint scanner is quite disappointing. It's interesting that the Samsung A34, which is being sold for 779 AED, has better specifications and speed. I had the opportunity to test the phone in person today and opening the Samsung browser took forever. I hate to say this, but it might be best to hold off on upgrading your phone for now.
+219 Reply