Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs A53 5G

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (with Exynos 2400e) that was released on September 26, 2024, against the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, which is powered by Exynos 1280 and came out 2 years and 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
  • 3.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1977K versus 621K)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
  • Delivers 64% higher peak brightness (1375 against 837 nits)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • The phone is 2 years and 7 months newer
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Weighs 24 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and A53 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Should I update?
No 84% Yes
Yes, this is a clear and meaningful upgrade.
Updating from Samsung Galaxy A53 5G to Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a clear step forward, and the improvements should be easy to notice.
Main improvements: gaming, performance, and camera.

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.5 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 385 ppi 405 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1300 nits 500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1900 nits 830 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Plus Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Screen-to-body ratio 88% 85.5%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 100% 97.6%
PWM 120 Hz 250 Hz
Response time 2 ms 9 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Galaxy S24 FE
6.7″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.1 in2
Galaxy A53 5G
6.5″ (20:9 ratio) = 15.8 in2
~8% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1375 nits
837 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 162 mm (6.38 inches) 159.6 mm (6.28 inches)
Width 77.3 mm (3.04 inches) 74.8 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.1 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 213 g (7.51 oz) 189 g (6.67 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP67
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Yellow White, Black, Blue, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.11/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 2400e Samsung Exynos 1280
Max clock 3110 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU cores 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.11 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache 8 MB -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 940 Mali-G68 MP4
GPU shading units 768 128
GPU clock 1095 MHz 897 MHz
FLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS ~229.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2045
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
6397
Compute Score (GPU)
16611
Compute Score (GPU) 16611 2341
Single-core score 2045 940
Multi-core score 6397 1974
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1977269
621907
CPU 675682 252449
GPU 670589 71629
Memory 229976 101323
UX 401022 196506
Total score 1977269 621907
Samples [55 tests] [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 70% -
Graphics test 13 FPS -
Graphics score 1769 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 29 FPS -
Section 1 35 FPS -
Section 2 28 FPS -
Section 3 24 FPS -
Graphics score 7699 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 3 FPS
Graphics score - 635
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
16227
Web score 15997 11160
Video editing 8031 8207
Photo editing 33878 23379
Data manipulation 12347 9873
Writing score 19836 14914

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShCPU Throttle0%
📘 2026-09-08 -> lUjekShGeekBench CPU2014 / 6373
📘 2026-09-03 (Digansh Y)AnTuTu2052468
📘 2026-08-24 (Vaqqas)AnTuTu1860306
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-16 -> SacredGold14GeekBench CPU856 / 2016
📘 2026-05-15 (mD)AnTuTu639223
📘 2026-05-08 (Devenkci)AnTuTu655361
📘 2026-03-03 (nightbet)AnTuTu621907
📘 2026-02-27 (nightbet)AnTuTu617754

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 4200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 2.2
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory card max size - Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM One UI 8.0 One UI 8.0
OS size 23.5 GB 36 GB
OS updates 4 years 4 years
Security updates 7 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 25 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (56% in 30 min) Yes (45% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:10 hr 1:24 hr
Battery cycles 2000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:20 hr 08:09 hr
Watching video 13:33 hr 12:55 hr
Gaming 05:11 hr 04:59 hr
Standby 129 hr 117 hr
General battery life
23:02 hr
22:13 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 64 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 9000 x 7000
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 8 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 64 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
4) Depth: 5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 64 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 24 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 Samsung S5KGW1P
Sensor size 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.72" (≈ 0.58 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 8 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Focal length 75 mm -
Sensor OmniVision OV08A10 -
Sensor size 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm 13 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3L6 -
Sensor size 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution - 5 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Stabilization - No

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 60 55
Preview 69 55
Zoom 126 82
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S24 FE from DxOMark Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy A53 5G from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 10 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 6464 x 4864
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3J1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.65" (≈ 0.38 inch) 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.1
Bluetooth features LE PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes -
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No Yes
LTE Cat* 20 18
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No -
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.9 dB
86.1 dB

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced September 2024 March 2022
Release date October 2024 April 2022
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $449
Successor - Samsung Galaxy S25 FE - Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
SAR (head) 0.86 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.29 W/kg -
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S24 FE:
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
51 (94.4%)
3 (5.6%)
Total votes: 54

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!