Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs A57 5G

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (with Exynos 2400) that was released on September 4, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G, which is powered by Exynos 1680 and came out 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • 50% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2087K versus 1390K)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • 54% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2126 and 1382 points
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
  • Delivers 50% higher peak brightness (1859 against 1240 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • The phone is 7 months newer

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and A57 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
69.8
(Good)
Value Index
59.4
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.7 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 385 ppi 385 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1300 nits 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1900 nits 1900 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate - 240 Hz
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Plus Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 89.2% 88.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.8%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1240 nits
1859 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 161.3 mm (6.35 inches) 161.5 mm (6.36 inches)
Width 76.6 mm (3.02 inches) 76.8 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) 6.9 mm (0.27 inches)
Weight 190 g (6.7 oz) 179 g (6.31 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Gray, Blue, Yellow Gray, Blue, Purple, Aqua
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.19/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 2400 Samsung Exynos 1680
Max clock 3200 MHz 2900 MHz
CPU cores 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 3 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
L3 cache 8 MB -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 940 Xclipse 550
GPU shading units 768 256
GPU clock 1095 MHz 1200 MHz
FLOPS ~3406.8 GFLOPS ~1228.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2126
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
6910
Compute Score (GPU)
18209
Compute Score (GPU) 18209 7924
Single-core score 2126 1382
Multi-core score 6910 4477
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2087886
1390055
CPU 714011 510705
GPU 653511 374535
Memory 303868 204469
UX 416496 300346
Total score 2087886 1390055
Samples [48 tests] [13 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 62% -
Graphics test 14 FPS -
Graphics score 1840 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 32 FPS -
Section 1 37 FPS -
Section 2 31 FPS -
Section 3 25 FPS -
Graphics score 8302 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12949 -
Video editing 8051 -
Photo editing 34315 -
Data manipulation 13202 -
Writing score 23460 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-03 (matthew ajero)AnTuTu 122377317
📘 2026-09-27 (Halil)AnTuTu 122426875
📘 2026-09-25 (Omar_syriangamerr)AnTuTu 122245977
📘 2026-09-12 -> Viljami22AnTuTu 122321618
📘 2026-09-11 -> S25fe6833AnTuTu 122388378
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 GPU6058
📘 2026-10-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 CPU1216 / 4433
📘 2026-09-25 (Anonim)AnTuTu 111375246
📘 2026-09-23 -> HaiLong0510AnTuTu 121533019
📘 2026-09-05 (Darck)AnTuTu 111348067

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM One UI 8.0 One UI 8.5
OS size 23.8 GB 24 GB
OS updates 7 years 6 years
Security updates 7 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 4900 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (52% in 30 min) Yes (64% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:10 hr 1:09 hr
Battery cycles 2000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 13:29 hr 10:41 hr
Watching video 14:24 hr 20:15 hr
Gaming 06:03 hr 05:40 hr
Standby 87 hr 85 hr
General battery life
24:20 hr
24:32 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 8 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 24 mm 23 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 8 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Focal length 75 mm -
Sensor OmniVision OV08A10 -
Sensor size 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm 13 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3L6 Sony IMX258
Sensor size 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution - 5 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Focal length - 25 mm
Stabilization - Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 150 -
Zoom 83 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor CMOS -
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced September 2025 March 2026
Release date September 2025 April 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $549
SAR (head) - 0.7 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.07 W/kg
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE. It has a better performance and gaming.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
671 (79.5%)
173 (20.5%)
Total votes: 844

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
uravinq September 10, 2026 at 10:01 PM
bruh people coping a57 is better than s25fe, i can't lol. for the same 12/256 variant, you could get secondhand like new s25fe at the same price as brand new a57. both are at $400
0 Reply
Avatar
RandomUser55 September 1, 2026 at 09:29 PM
Hello friends, I've been looking for a phone for a long time and I'm stuck between the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G (8/128) and the Poco X8 Pro (12/512). I want my phone to perform well with balanced usage, but I'm still a bit prejudiced against Xiaomi. Are their software still bad, and is the Poco X8 Pro Max weak in terms of camera? I would appreciate your help. Also, since my English is not very good, I used translation, so I apologize if there are any errors.
+4 Reply
Avatar
Skali September 2, 2026 at 06:40 PM
The Poco X8 Pro is better on paper but HyperOS (especially for poco) is bloated and gets 4 years of OS Updates while the A57 gets 6.So it depends
+1 Reply
Avatar
PhoneDude August 25, 2026 at 10:47 PM
well I can get an a57 for 306 euro and s25fe for 507 euro, I think I know which the better value phone
+1 Reply
h9.15 September 10, 2026 at 08:58 PM
A57 is better for value than S25 FE
0 Reply
Avatar
Jac August 5, 2026 at 06:09 AM
What!A57 camera better!!!
0 Reply
Avatar
Sodiun July 16, 2026 at 04:31 PM
A57 best for 549$ s25 fe best for 649$
0 Reply
Avatar
Gabriel July 3, 2026 at 07:45 AM
This thing shouldn't even be a debate
0 Reply
Avatar
Gugugaga June 4, 2026 at 03:18 PM
A57 5g winnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
+16 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous June 6, 2026 at 07:36 AM
A57 losseeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+14 Reply
Avatar
Gugugaga June 16, 2026 at 09:03 AM
Anonymous, S25 fe loseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+3 Reply
h9.15 June 30, 2026 at 11:13 PM
Gugugaga, Bruh, bro all people know that S25 FE is much better than A57 5G ( both phones are very good ), and that's mean S25 FE winnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.
+11 Reply