Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon) vs S22 (Snapdragon)
88
out of 100
VS
62
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon) (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on February 25, 2026, against the Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and came out 4 years and 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon)
- 3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3811K versus 1281K)
- Has a 0.6 inch larger screen size
- Comes with 1200 mAh larger battery capacity: 4900 vs 3700 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- The phone is 4 years and 1 month newer
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 21% higher pixel density (516 vs 425 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 25W)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- Better grip in hands β the body is 5.2 mm narrower
- Weighs 23 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 516 ppi | 425 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1500 nits | 780 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 2600 nits | 1300 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | Gorilla Glass Victus Plus |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.7% | 88.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Screen space comparison
Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon)
6.7β³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.1 in2
Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
6.1β³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 14.2 in2
~20% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 158.4 mm (6.24 inches) | 146 mm (5.75 inches) |
| Width | 75.8 mm (2.98 inches) | 70.6 mm (2.78 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) | 7.6 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 167 g (5.89 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Silver, Blue, Pink, Purple | White, Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Pink, Purple, Yellow |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Max clock | 4740 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X2 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Adreno 730 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 818 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~1675.3 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27258 | 5646 |
| Single-core score | 3634 | 1703 |
| Multi-core score | 11036 | 4021 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1126364 | 492631 |
| GPU | 1506051 | 220632 |
| Memory | 430002 | 204295 |
| UX | 748714 | 363661 |
| Total score | 3811131 | 1281210 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [11 tests] |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 52% |
| Graphics test | - | 11 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2003 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 12379 |
| Video editing | - | 7351 |
| Photo editing | - | 28711 |
| Data manipulation | - | 10875 |
| Writing score | - | 14823 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#39th place)
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-07-25 (Ahmed) | AnTuTu 11 | 3643182 |
| π 2026-06-13 (Sparky) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 29139 |
| π 2026-06-03 (Krish) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 25262 |
| π 2026-06-03 (Krish) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3634 / 11036 |
| π 2026-06-03 (Krish) | AnTuTu 11 | 3811131 |
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-27 (Khaled) | AnTuTu 11 | 1341721 |
| π 2026-06-28 (swooo_rd) | AnTuTu 11 | 1367038 |
| π 2026-06-04 (S22) | AnTuTu 11 | 1310708 |
| π 2026-05-17 (Lashra) | AnTuTu 11 | 1346980 |
| π 2026-05-17 (Licola) | AnTuTu 11 | 1318272 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | One UI 8.5 | One UI 8.0 |
| OS size | 30.8 GB | - |
| OS updates | 7 years | - |
| Security updates | 7 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 4900 mAh | 3700 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 25 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (25 W) | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (69% in 30 min) | Yes (63% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:01 hr | 1:03 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 06:06 hr |
| Watching video | - | 10:26 hr |
| Gaming | - | 04:19 hr |
| Standby | - | 89 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8160 x 6120 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | 120Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 10 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 10 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGNG | Samsung GN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 69 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5K3LD | Sony IMX772 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.94" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/3.94" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX564 | Sony IMX713 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55" (β 0.39 inch) | 1/2.55" (β 0.39 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.4 micron | 1.4 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3LU | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2" (β 0.31 inch) | 1/3.24" (β 0.31 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes, DP 1.2 | Yes, DP 1.2 |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February 2026 | February 2022 |
| Release date | March 2026 | February 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1099 | $799 |
| Successor | - | - Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon) |
| SAR (head) | 0.78 W/kg | 0.21 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | 1.22 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus (Snapdragon) is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2