Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 vs Motorola Razr Plus (2024)
67
out of 100
VS
66
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2) that was released on July 26, 2023, against the Motorola Razr Plus (2024), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and came out 11 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5
- 51% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1746K versus 1158K)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr Plus (2024)
- Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
- The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
- Shows 14% longer battery life (19:24 vs 17:05 hours)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Delivers 15% higher peak brightness (1259 against 1095 nits)
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 25W)
- The phone is 11 months newer
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | POLED |
| Size | 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels | 1080 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 21.9:9 | 22:9 |
| PPI | 425 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-165 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 3000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1200 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8% | 84.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 97.3% | 94.4% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 11 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 165.1 mm (6.5 inches) | 171.4 mm (6.75 inches) |
| Width | 71.9 mm (2.83 inches) | 74 mm (2.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) | 7.1 mm (0.28 inches) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Waterproof | IPX8 | IPX8 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Eco-leather |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Green, Purple, Yellow | Blue, Green, Pink, Yellow |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3200 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X3 |
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | Adreno 735 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 680 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2089 GFLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| Single-core score | 2100 | 2023 |
| Multi-core score | 5478 | 5601 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 594031 | 368065 |
| GPU | 448113 | 258814 |
| Memory | 279549 | 250835 |
| UX | 424506 | 281273 |
| Total score | 1746199 | 1158987 |
| Samples | [6 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 61% | 52% |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | 962 | 1007 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | 50% | - |
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |
| Section 1 | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| Section 2 | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| Section 3 | 16 FPS | 12 FPS |
| Graphics score | 4866 | 4189 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 46% | - |
| Graphics test | 20 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3495 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 20437 |
| Video editing | - | 7272 |
| Photo editing | - | 31133 |
| Data manipulation | - | 15938 |
| Writing score | - | 22269 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-28 (test) | AnTuTu | 1776402 |
| 📘 2026-05-13 -> Otchem1488 | AnTuTu | 1746199 |
| 📘 2026-05-04 (mtd) | AnTuTu | 1743099 |
| 📘 2026-04-06 (Otchem1488) | AnTuTu | 1723909 |
| 📘 2025-10-30 (Banan) | AnTuTu | 1781616 |
Motorola Razr Plus (2024)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-01-16 (NikimanTI) | AnTuTu | 1158987 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 3200 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 |
| ROM | One UI 8.5 | Hello UI |
| OS size | 40 GB | - |
| OS updates | 4 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 4 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 3700 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 25 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (55% in 30 min) | Yes (78% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:19 hr | 0:47 hr |
| Web browsing | 05:13 hr | 08:02 hr |
| Watching video | 10:25 hr | 13:57 hr |
| Gaming | 03:58 hr | 05:14 hr |
| Standby | 96 hr | 79 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4000 x 3000 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 123° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 12 MP 2) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K2LD | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.76" (≈ 0.57 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.8 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | - | 47 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 13 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX258 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 60 | - |
| Preview | 65 | - |
| Zoom | 95 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 10 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3" (≈ 0.33 inch) | 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes, DP 1.2 | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | July 2023 | June 2024 |
| Release date | August 2023 | June 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $999 |
| Successor | - Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 | - Motorola Razr Plus (2025) |
| SAR (head) | 0.6 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 1.45 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 68 W |
Further details
Notes on Razr Plus (2024):
- Outside the US, this device is branded as the Motorola 50 Ultra.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, performance, gaming, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Motorola Razr Plus (2024).
Cast your vote
Total votes: 10