Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 vs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on July 10, 2024, against the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 year and 10 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
16 / 512 GB

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
  • 43% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3379K versus 2362K)
  • Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (68W versus 25W)
  • Has a 0.3 inch larger screen size
  • The phone is 1 year and 10 months newer
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • 28% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2874 and 2247 points

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 128 GB
VS
16 / 512 GB
31.1
(Mediocre)
Value Index
24.5
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED POLED
Size 6.7 inches 7 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2640 pixels 1224 x 2992 pixels
Aspect ratio 22:9 22:9
PPI 426 ppi 462 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1600 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 2600 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate - 300 Hz
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Gorilla Glass Ceramic
Screen-to-body ratio 85.4% 87.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 97.6% 103.2%
PWM 120 Hz 142 Hz
Response time 2 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Razr Ultra (2026)
7″ (22:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
Galaxy Z Flip 6
6.7″ (22:9 ratio) = 15.7 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1369 nits
1428 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 165.1 mm (6.5 inches) 171.48 mm (6.75 inches)
Width 71.9 mm (2.83 inches) 73.99 mm (2.91 inches)
Thickness 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) 7.29 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 199 g (7.02 oz)
Waterproof IP48 IP48
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Silver, Blue, Yellow Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 3390 MHz 4470 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 750 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 903-1000 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 13050 25766
Single-core score 2247 2874
Multi-core score 6857 8889
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2362730
3379591
CPU 738025 919852
GPU 766754 1307802
Memory 343545 646515
UX 514406 505422
Total score 2362730 3379591
Samples [2 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 58% -
Graphics test 11 FPS -
Graphics score 1441 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 27 FPS -
Section 1 34 FPS -
Section 2 27 FPS -
Section 3 22 FPS -
Graphics score 7215 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 26 FPS -
Graphics score 4456 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 17131 -
Video editing 8092 -
Photo editing 31931 -
Data manipulation 14983 -
Writing score 22467 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (182nd and 57th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-05 (evgeniy fimoZ)AnTuTu 112295335
📘 2026-06-24 (Simeoncorleone)AnTuTu 112362730
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory clock 3200 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 512 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 16
ROM One UI 8.0 -
OS size 25.6 GB 17 GB
OS updates 4 years -
Security updates 5 years -

Battery

Capacity 4000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 68 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) Yes (30 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (44% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 1:41 hr -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 05:56 hr -
Watching video 13:24 hr -
Gaming 04:18 hr -
Standby 89 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 122°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL GN3 -
Sensor size 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 13 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL 3LU -
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.6 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 70 -
Preview 76 -
Zoom 124 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 10 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL 3J1 -
Sensor size 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1.22 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced July 2024 April 2026
Release date July 2024 May 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $1099 $1499
Successor - Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 68 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
3 (100%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!