Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
76
out of 100
VS
86
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 (with Exynos 2500) that was released on July 9, 2025, against the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 10 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
- Higher display refresh rate β 165 Hz
- 48% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3379K versus 2289K)
- Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (68W versus 25W)
- Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4300 mAh
- 16% higher pixel density (462 vs 397 PPI)
- The phone is 10 months newer
- 26% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2874 and 2285 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | POLED |
| Size | 6.9 inches | 7 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2520 pixels | 1224 x 2992 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 22:9 |
| PPI | 397 ppi | 462 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 2600 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass Ceramic |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 87.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.7% | 103.2% |
| PWM | 240 Hz | 142 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | β Infinity | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 166.7 mm (6.56 inches) | 171.48 mm (6.75 inches) |
| Width | 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) | 73.99 mm (2.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) | 7.29 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP48 | IP48 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | - |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Red | Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Average (2.96/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 210 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 3300 MHz | 4470 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (1 + 2 + 5 + 2) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 5 cores at 2.36 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 2.74 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Xclipse 950 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 999 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4091.9 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 18873 | 25766 |
| Single-core score | 2285 | 2874 |
| Multi-core score | 7874 | 8889 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 771016 | 919852 |
| GPU | 723824 | 1307802 |
| Memory | 356421 | 646515 |
| UX | 438435 | 505422 |
| Total score | 2289696 | 3379591 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 54% | - |
| Graphics test | 17 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2231 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 36 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 43 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 35 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 29 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 9397 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15720 | - |
| Video editing | 8133 | - |
| Photo editing | 32035 | - |
| Data manipulation | 11954 | - |
| Writing score | 22532 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#57th place)
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-05-16 -> INFC | AnTuTu 11 | 2220403 |
| π 2026-01-01 (Koss) | AnTuTu 11 | 2437711 |
| π 2025-12-19 (Yell) | AnTuTu 11 | 2112394 |
| π 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12 | Geekbench 6 GPU | 18873 |
| π 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12 | AnTuTu 11 | 2496663 |
Motorola Razr Ultra (2026)
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | One UI 8.0 | - |
| OS size | 27 GB | 17 GB |
| OS updates | 7 years | - |
| Security updates | 7 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 4300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 25 W | 68 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (46% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:31 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 2000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 08:49 hr | - |
| Watching video | 15:58 hr | - |
| Gaming | 04:38 hr | - |
| Standby | 84 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 123Β° | 122Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL GN3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL 3LU | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2" (β 0.31 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 10 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL 3J1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0" (β 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | July 2025 | April 2026 |
| Release date | July 2025 | May 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1099 | $1499 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 68 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Razr Ultra (2026) is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 16