Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 7.6-inch Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2) that was released on July 26, 2023, against the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, which is powered by Google Tensor G4 and came out 1 year and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
  • Shows 16% longer battery life (22:55 vs 19:45 hours)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • 30% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1818K versus 1401K)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 20.3 mm narrower
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • Delivers 65% higher peak brightness (2093 against 1266 nits)
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
  • Has a 0.4 inch larger screen size
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 25W)
  • The phone is 1 year and 1 month newer

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
16 / 256 GB
11.2
(Bad)
Value Index
14.3
(Bad)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED OLED
Size 7.6 inches 8 inches
Resolution 1812 x 2176 pixels 2076 x 2152 pixels
Aspect ratio 10.81:9 1:1
PPI 374 ppi 373 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (10-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 600 nits 2700 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1750 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 -
Screen-to-body ratio 91.1% 88.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 94.7% 98.5%
PWM 120 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 4 ms 4 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Pixel 9 Pro Fold
8″ (1:1 ratio) = 32 in2
Galaxy Z Fold 5
7.6″ (10.81:9 ratio) = 28.4 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1266 nits
2093 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 154.9 mm (6.1 inches) 155.2 mm (6.11 inches)
Width 129.9 mm (5.11 inches) 150.2 mm (5.91 inches)
Thickness 6.1 mm (0.24 inches) 5.1 mm (0.2 inches)
Weight 253 g (8.92 oz) 257 g (9.07 oz)
Waterproof IPX8 IPX8
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Gray, Blue White, Black
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Google Tensor G4
Max clock 3360 MHz 3100 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A710
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X3
- 4 cores at 1.92 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.1 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 740 Mali-G715 MC7
GPU shading units 1536 896
GPU clock 680 MHz 940 MHz
FLOPS ~2089 GFLOPS ~1684.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Single-core score 2062 2048
Multi-core score 5396 4910
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1818396
CPU 600928 476883
GPU 448555 385522
Memory 284750 203655
UX 484163 335261
Total score 1818396 1401321
Samples [4 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 74% 84%
Graphics test 8 FPS 8 FPS
Graphics score 1142 1049
3DMark Solar Bay
Stability 71% -
Graphics test 21 FPS -
Section 1 24 FPS -
Section 2 21 FPS -
Section 3 17 FPS -
Graphics score 5460 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 57% -
Graphics test 21 FPS -
Graphics score 3603 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15086 10521
Video editing 7879 7569
Photo editing 33582 21074
Data manipulation 12994 14718
Writing score 19605 15880

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-11 (Anekochan)AnTuTu 111824088
📘 2026-05-09 (Laixy)AnTuTu 111839549
📘 2026-03-30 (Jesus)AnTuTu 111818396
📘 2025-12-10 (Ксюшкинс)AnTuTu 111787267
📘 2025-12-02 (Тг: @RTX5090Palit)AnTuTu 111742781
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4200 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM One UI 8.5 Stock Android
OS size 34 GB 27 GB
OS updates 4 years 7 years
Security updates 5 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 4400 mAh 4650 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) Yes (7.5 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) -
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes (46% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:24 hr 1:36 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:04 hr 08:24 hr
Watching video 12:40 hr 12:56 hr
Gaming 05:13 hr 05:05 hr
Standby 126 hr 85 hr
General battery life
22:55 hr
19:45 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8000 x 6000
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 5x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 127°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Telephoto: 10.8 MP
3) Ultrawide: 10.5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.7
Focal length 23 mm 25 mm
Sensor Samsung GN3 -
Sensor size 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 10 MP 10.8 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/3.1
Focal length 66 mm 112 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3K1 Samsung S5K3J1
Sensor size 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.22 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 10.5 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 12 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX258 -
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.4" (≈ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 70 55
Preview 76 77
Zoom 128 124
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 from DxOMark Photo samples of Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Image resolution 3648 x 2736 -
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony IMX374 -
Sensor size 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) 1/3.94" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron -
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Additional lens 10 MP, Sony IMX374, f/26, 1/3.2" -
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness
88.4 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced July 2023 August 2024
Release date August 2023 September 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $1799 $1799
Successor - Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
SAR (head) 1.24 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.19 W/kg -
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display and camera are more important to you, then choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold. But if the performance, gaming, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
14 (63.6%)
8 (36.4%)
Total votes: 22

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!