Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Pova 6 Neo

56 out of 100
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
VS
52 out of 100
Tecno Pova 6 Neo

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.78-inch Tecno Pova 6 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 6080) that was released on February 26, 2024, against the Tecno Pova 6 Neo, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 6 Pro
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (70W versus 33W)
  • AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
  • Thinner bezels – 5% more screen real estate
  • Reverse charging feature
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 6 Neo
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14

Review

Evaluation of Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Pova 6 Neo crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
98.1
(Very good)
Value Index
100.8
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 6.78 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2436 pixels 1080 x 2460 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 21:9
PPI 393 ppi 396 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) No
Max rated brightness 1300 nits 580 nits
HDR support No No
Touch sampling rate 180 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 88.1% 83.1%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 138.6% -
PWM 90 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1067 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 165.5 mm (6.52 inches) 168.6 mm (6.64 inches)
Width 76.1 mm (3 inches) 76.6 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 9.23 mm (0.36 inches)
Weight 198.3 g (6.99 oz) 206 g (7.27 oz)
Waterproof IP53 IP53
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Gray, Green Black, Silver, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio
88.1%
83.1%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Tecno Pova 6 Neo
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 6080 MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate
Max clock 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A76
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
L3 cache 2 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MP2
GPU shading units 64 64
GPU clock 1068 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS ~136.7 GFLOPS ~128 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Tecno Pova 6 Neo
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
770
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
2096
1986
Single-core score 770 720
Multi-core score 2096 1986
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
552385
568329
CPU 201079 217879
GPU 47127 48195
Memory 138242 138016
UX 164937 164239
Total score 552385 568329
Samples [4 tests] [5 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
152
Stability 97% 97%
Graphics test 1 FPS 1 FPS
Graphics score 152 147
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
10359
10853
Web score 10232 11051
Video editing 5069 6388
Photo editing 23005 25122
Data manipulation 7812 6652
Writing score 13854 12899

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-11 (Matt Official)AnTuTu 11591404
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-08 (GML1V)AnTuTu 11503172
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-30 (Techmario)AnTuTu 11533601
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-11 (dunduk)AnTuTu 11552385
Tecno Pova 6 Neo
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-26 -> VyzarzAnTuTu 11586335
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-13 (3xs)AnTuTu 11567748
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-25 (nhlPYCC)AnTuTu 11568329
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-11 (MoonLake)AnTuTu 11552271
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-22 (Илья)CPU Throttle100%

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 14 Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15)
ROM HIOS 14 HIOS 15
OS size 56 GB -

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 70 W 33 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (65% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 40 min)
Full charging time 1:00 hr 1:54 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:48 hr -
Watching video 16:03 hr -
Gaming 05:34 hr -
Standby 155 hr -
General battery life
30:11 hr

Main camera

Matrix 108 megapixels 50 megapixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 108 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 108 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.7
Focal length 24 mm -
Sensor size 1/1.52" (β‰ˆ 0.66 inch) -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 8 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 22 mm -
Sensor CMOS -
Sensor size 1/3.1" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 13
5G support Yes No

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio Yes Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced February 2024 April 2024
Release date March 2024 April 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $229 $180
Successor - Tecno Pova 7 Pro 5G - Tecno Pova 7 Neo
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 70 W Yes, 33 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, camera, gaming, battery life, and design are more important to you, then choose the Tecno Pova 6 Pro. But if the software is more of a priority – go for the Tecno Pova 6 Neo.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
79 (67.5%)
38 (32.5%)
Total votes: 117

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Greatness July 23, 2025 at 05:46 AM
I like Neo because of the battery but the absence of IR Blaster puts me off πŸ˜”
0 Reply
Avatar
Vin March 24, 2025 at 12:50 PM
prefer neo because it's not a big difference
0 Reply