Tecno Pova 7 5G vs Infinix Note 50 Pro 4G
62
out of 100
VS
56
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.78-inch Tecno Pova 7 5G (with MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate) that was released on July 4, 2025, against the Infinix Note 50 Pro 4G, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 7 5G
- 49% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (864K versus 580K)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- More energy-efficient CPU – Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 41% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1011 and 718 points
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 50 Pro 4G
- Optical image stabilization
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 45W)
- AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels | 1080 x 2436 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 396 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max rated brightness | 900 nits | 1300 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.8% | 91.4% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design and build
| Height | 167.3 mm (6.59 inches) | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 inches) | 74.4 mm (2.93 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) | 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 207 g (7.3 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP64 | IP64 |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Green | Black, Gray, Green, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.42/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Very good (B) · 180 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Max clock | 2500 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 655 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 1047 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~536.1 GFLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2488 | 1467 |
| Single-core score | 1011 | 718 |
| Multi-core score | 2813 | 1955 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 326668 | 216200 |
| GPU | 126634 | 50334 |
| Memory | 136410 | 136075 |
| UX | 274846 | 178204 |
| Total score | 864548 | 580813 |
| Samples | [16 tests] | [10 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 99% | 97% |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| Graphics score | 348 | 146 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11044 | 10722 |
| Video editing | 6703 | 6264 |
| Photo editing | 35286 | 24469 |
| Data manipulation | 8165 | 6542 |
| Writing score | 18065 | 12490 |
Recent User Tests
Tecno Pova 7 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-30 (Алексей) | AnTuTu 12 | 898347 |
| 📘 2026-09-29 (Алексей) | AnTuTu 12 | 898347 |
| 📘 2026-08-31 (Prawowok) | AnTuTu 11 | 857794 |
| 📘 2026-08-11 (Viel) | AnTuTu 11 | 801478 |
| 📘 2026-07-22 (Ziyaan) | AnTuTu 11 | 899719 |
Infinix Note 50 Pro 4G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-17 (Supardi) | AnTuTu 11 | 580813 |
| 📘 2026-04-16 (Adhamjon) | AnTuTu 11 | 584886 |
| 📘 2026-04-04 (Nino/gundul roam paling jago) | AnTuTu 11 | 586170 |
| 📘 2026-03-16 (Fyzn) | AnTuTu 11 | 544554 |
| 📘 2026-03-13 (@mixliboyev) | AnTuTu 11 | 523587 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HIOS 15 | XOS 15 |
| OS updates | 1 year | 2 years |
| Security updates | 2 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 19 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:09 hr | 0:38 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 800 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/1.9 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 8 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 15 mm |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 13 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Depends on the region |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | No |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | July 2025 | March 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | March 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $190 | $200 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 90 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Tecno Pova 7 5G is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 26