Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs Google Pixel 11 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on February 4, 2026, against the Google Pixel 11 Pro, which is powered by Google Tensor G6 and came out 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 2.4x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4602K versus 1925K)
  • Comes with 2550 mAh larger battery capacity: 7400 vs 4850 mAh
  • Has a 0.55 inch larger screen size
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 30W)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro
  • Delivers 113% higher peak brightness (3260 against 1529 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • The phone is 7 months newer
  • Weighs 23 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Google Pixel 11 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
16 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
62.9
(Average)
Value Index
35.4
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.3 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1280 x 2856 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.8:9 20:9
PPI 508 ppi 497 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2600 nits 3600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 8000 nits 2400 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 475 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90.7% 87.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
iQOO 15 Ultra
6.85β€³ (19.8:9 ratio) = 17.7 in2
Pixel 11 Pro
6.3β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 14.9 in2
~19% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1529 nits
Pixel 11 Pro +113%
3260 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.65 mm (6.44 inches) 152.7 mm (6.01 inches)
Width 76.8 mm (3.02 inches) 71.9 mm (2.83 inches)
Thickness 8.7 mm (0.34 inches) 8.4 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 227 g (8.01 oz) 204 g (7.2 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Advanced cooling Active fan Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver Black, Blue, Green, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
90.7%
87.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Google Pixel 11 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Google Tensor G6
Max clock 4610 MHz 4110 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 7 (1 + 4 + 2)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 2 cores at 2.65 GHz: C1-Pro
- 4 cores at 3.38 GHz: C1-Pro
- 1 core at 4.11 GHz: C1-Ultra
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 PowerVR CXTP-48-1536
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1286 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~1975.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Google Pixel 11 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3615
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11366
Compute Score (GPU)
27924
Compute Score (GPU) 27924 6195
Single-core score 3615 2688
Multi-core score 11366 6871
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
4602290
1925523
CPU 1102292 873099
GPU 1604604 286837
Memory 789150 301575
UX 1106244 464012
Total score 4602290 1925523
Samples [3 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 68% -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
Graphics score 3081 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 54 FPS -
Section 1 60 FPS -
Section 2 55 FPS -
Section 3 46 FPS -
Graphics score 14183 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 18545 -
Video editing 6849 -
Photo editing 34832 -
Data manipulation 14303 -
Writing score 28711 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (NPT)Geekbench 6 CPU3568 / 11293
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv)AnTuTu 114602290
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv)AnTuTu 114651882
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-08 (z strikes again)AnTuTu 114314224
Google Pixel 11 Pro
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 16 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 17
ROM OriginOS 6 Stock Android
OS size 96 GB -
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Security updates 5 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7400 mAh 4850 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 30 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (25 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 24 min) Yes (59% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:06 hr 1:20 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 10:48 hr
Watching video - 22:07 hr
Gaming - 06:33 hr
Standby - 86 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 5x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 107Β° 123Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.7
Focal length 23 mm 25 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 -
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.3" (β‰ˆ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.7 f/2.8
Focal length 85 mm 106 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.1 f/1.7
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.51" (β‰ˆ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 42 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 21 mm 17 mm
Sensor CMOS Sony IMX858
Sensor size 1/3.1" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) 1/2.51" (β‰ˆ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced February 2026 August 2026
Release date February 2026 August 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $849 $1099
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (33.3%)
2 (66.7%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!