Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs Oppo Find X9
93
out of 100
VS
90
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on February 4, 2026, against the Oppo Find X9, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9500 and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 35% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4602K versus 3400K)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Delivers 38% higher peak brightness (1541 against 1115 nits)
- Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
- 10% higher pixel density (508 vs 460 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
- 16% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3615 and 3107 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9
- Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
- Weighs 24 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.85 inches | 6.59 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1256 x 2760 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 508 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 2600 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 8000 nits | 3600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 475 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 90.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 100% | 98.9% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | 474 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 20 ms |
| Contrast | β Infinity | β Infinity |
Screen space comparison
iQOO 15 Ultra
6.85β³ (19.8:9 ratio) = 17.7 in2
Find X9
6.59β³ (20:9 ratio) = 16.3 in2
~8% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.65 mm (6.44 inches) | 156.98 mm (6.18 inches) |
| Width | 76.8 mm (3.02 inches) | 73.93 mm (2.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm (0.34 inches) | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 227 g (8.01 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Active fan | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver | White, Black, Gray, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.71/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Average (D) Β· 45 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max clock | 4610 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27924 | 28255 |
| Single-core score | 3615 | 3107 |
| Multi-core score | 11366 | 9557 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1102292 | 966933 |
| GPU | 1604604 | 1291009 |
| Memory | 789150 | 423697 |
| UX | 1106244 | 718784 |
| Total score | 4602290 | 3400423 |
| Samples | [3 tests] | [7 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 68% | 52% |
| Graphics test | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| Graphics score | 3081 | 3119 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 54 FPS | 48 FPS |
| Section 1 | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| Section 2 | 55 FPS | 48 FPS |
| Section 3 | 46 FPS | 41 FPS |
| Graphics score | 14183 | 12571 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 18545 | 11502 |
| Video editing | 6849 | 5863 |
| Photo editing | 34832 | 23536 |
| Data manipulation | 14303 | 12903 |
| Writing score | 28711 | 19110 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (5th and 43rd place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-30 (NPT) | GeekBench CPU | 3568 / 11293 |
| π 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv) | AnTuTu | 4602290 |
| π 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv) | AnTuTu | 4651882 |
| π 2026-02-08 (z strikes again) | AnTuTu | 4314224 |
Oppo Find X9
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-01 (Azad Boyka) | AnTuTu | 3406583 |
| π 2026-07-13 (Dazza29) | GeekBench GPU | 24276 |
| π 2026-07-13 (Dazza29) | GeekBench CPU | 1953 / 3134 |
| π 2026-06-29 (No name) | AnTuTu | 3272691 |
| π 2026-05-28 (Aditya) | GeekBench CPU | 3107 / 9557 |
Memory
| RAM size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | ColorOS 16 |
| OS size | 96 GB | 14 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7400 mAh | 7025 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 24 min) | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:06 hr | 1:15 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1300 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 107Β° | 120Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.65 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony LYT-808 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 73 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.5 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1" (β 0.32 inch) | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February 2026 | October 2025 |
| Release date | February 2026 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $849 | $899 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display, battery life, connectivity, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra. But if the camera is more of a priority β go for the Oppo Find X9.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 17