Vivo IQOO Neo 10 Pro vs iQOO 13
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo IQOO Neo 10 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on November 29, 2024, against the Vivo iQOO 13, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 Pro
- Reverse charging feature
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 13
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
- 16% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3150K versus 2727K)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- 13% higher pixel density (510 vs 453 PPI)
- 8% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3008 and 2797 points
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.82 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 453 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-144 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 89.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.92 mm (6.41 inches) | 163.37 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 75.4 mm (2.97 inches) | 76.71 mm (3.02 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.13 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | - | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Orange | White, Black, Silver, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 3630 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 21681 | 24763 |
| Single-core score | 2797 | 3008 |
| Multi-core score | 8767 | 9297 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 806945 | 903944 |
| GPU | 986487 | 1153744 |
| Memory | 338612 | 415491 |
| UX | 595231 | 677376 |
| Total score | 2727275 | 3150555 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [33 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 77% |
| Graphics test | 17 FPS | 19 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2339 | 2509 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 41 FPS | 44 FPS |
| Section 1 | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| Section 2 | 42 FPS | 44 FPS |
| Section 3 | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| Graphics score | 10747 | 11463 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| Graphics score | 6272 | 6250 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14993 | 14234 |
| Video editing | 5629 | 6801 |
| Photo editing | 29022 | 39527 |
| Data manipulation | 12995 | 13253 |
| Writing score | 19895 | 20704 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (132nd and 79th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo IQOO Neo 10 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-11-06 (F1anee) | CPU Throttle | 92% |
| 📘 2025-10-08 (fagort) | AnTuTu 11 | 2727275 |
| 📘 2025-02-19 (Allyera) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 21681 |
| 📘 2025-02-19 (Allyera) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2797 / 8767 |
| 📘 2025-02-18 (Allyera) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2720 / 6348 |
Vivo iQOO 13
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-25 (Asuna) | AnTuTu 11 | 3203192 |
| 📘 2026-09-24 (Fenix) | AnTuTu 12 | 3343403 |
| 📘 2026-08-15 (Kh) | AnTuTu 11 | 3166164 |
| 📘 2026-08-03 (ShiNo_Maebure) | AnTuTu 11 | 3090760 |
| 📘 2026-07-08 (Edward) | AnTuTu 11 | 3239284 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | OriginOS 5 | Funtouch 16 |
| OS updates | 3 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6100 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 120 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 15 min) | Yes (91% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:30 hr | 0:32 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 14:22 hr |
| Watching video | - | 17:57 hr |
| Gaming | - | 08:12 hr |
| Standby | - | 129 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#39th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119° | 119° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | - | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | - | 50 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX816 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | - | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 28 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | GalaxyCore GC32E1 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | November 2024 | October 2024 |
| Release date | November 2024 | November 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | $650 |
| Successor | - | - Vivo iQOO 15 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 120 W |
Further details
Notes on iQOO 13:
- Only the 16/512 GB variant has UFS 4.1 storage; the rest use UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display, camera, performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Vivo iQOO 13. But if the sound is more of a priority – go for the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 Pro.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 196
Related comparisons
7.
Vivo iQOO 13 vs OnePlus 13 (3)