Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on October 30, 2025, against the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
  • 82% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3225K versus 1771K)
  • Comes with 1500 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 6000 mAh
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Optical image stabilization
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 70W)
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 11% higher pixel density (510 vs 460 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G
  • Handles wireless charging up to 30W
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
155.8
(Excellent)
Value Index
54.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.8:9 20:9
PPI 510 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1800 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Rock Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 90.2% 89.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 163.37 mm (6.43 inches) 160 mm (6.3 inches)
Width 76.71 mm (3.02 inches) 75.2 mm (2.96 inches)
Thickness 8.05 mm (0.32 inches) 8.9 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 210 g (7.41 oz) 201 g (7.09 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP64
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material - Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue, Orange White, Black
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
Max clock 4320 MHz 3350 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek APU 780
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Mali-G615 MP6
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1400 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 25182 8369
Single-core score 2936 1190
Multi-core score 9211 3914
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3225862
1771444
CPU 1012692 519471
GPU 1121085 493745
Memory 400893 362570
UX 691192 395658
Total score 3225862 1771444
Samples [11 tests] [18 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 49% -
Graphics test 18 FPS 9 FPS
Graphics score 2406 1205
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 18845 -
Video editing 7438 -
Photo editing 33345 -
Data manipulation 11728 -
Writing score 16618 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-08 -> Knsvmc442AnTuTu3241530
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Rafi)GeekBench CPU2936 / 9211
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 (Abama)AnTuTu3314923
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 (PuzoTras)AnTuTu3201580
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-11 -> w3infoxGeekBench GPU25182
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Dobielada)AnTuTu1831291
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 (Jeekei Cars)AnTuTu1667428
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-11 (Wwem)AnTuTu1798534
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-06 (lol_amazingken)AnTuTu1820992
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-26 (Bruh)AnTuTu1735346

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM OriginOS 6 HIOS 15

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 70 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (30 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (50% in 18 min)
Full charging time - 0:55 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 108 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens 119Β° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 108 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 108 MP
Aperture f/1.9 -
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Sony LYT-700C -
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 13 megapixels
Aperture f/2.5 -
Sensor Sony IMX480 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.09" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced October 2025 June 2025
Release date October 2025 July 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $370 $420
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 70 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
9 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 9

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!