Vivo V60 vs iQOO Neo 11 (China)
69
out of 100
VS
86
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.77-inch Vivo V60 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4) that was released on August 12, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo V60
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Weighs 18 grams less
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
- 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3225K versus 1257K)
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 6500 mAh
- 31% higher pixel density (510 vs 388 PPI)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 2.2
- 2.4x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2936 and 1247 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 inches | 6.82 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.8:9 |
| PPI | 388 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1500 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Schott Xensation Core | Rock Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 90.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 163.53 mm (6.44 inches) | 163.37 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 76.96 mm (3.03 inches) | 76.71 mm (3.02 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.69 mm (0.3 inches) | 8.05 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | - |
| Frame material | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | Gold, Gray, Blue | White, Black, Blue, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 2800 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720) - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720) |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 722 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 512 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1177.6 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 6568 | 25182 |
| Single-core score | 1247 | 2936 |
| Multi-core score | 3557 | 9211 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 474474 | 1012692 |
| GPU | 253163 | 1121085 |
| Memory | 184094 | 400893 |
| UX | 346123 | 691192 |
| Total score | 1257854 | 3225862 |
| Samples | [9 tests] | [11 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | 49% |
| Graphics test | 5 FPS | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | 667 | 2406 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 8850 | 18845 |
| Video editing | 6242 | 7438 |
| Photo editing | 23969 | 33345 |
| Data manipulation | 10504 | 11728 |
| Writing score | 13580 | 16618 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#62nd place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo V60
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-07 (Aman Sthapak) | AnTuTu | 1250792 |
| π 2026-05-14 (CrustyName) | GeekBench GPU | 6568 |
| π 2026-05-14 (CrustyName) | GeekBench CPU | 1247 / 3557 |
| π 2026-03-23 (Dodi) | AnTuTu | 1231015 |
| π 2026-03-21 (Dodi) | AnTuTu | 1221047 |
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-08 -> Knsvmc442 | AnTuTu | 3241530 |
| π 2026-08-02 (Rafi) | GeekBench CPU | 2936 / 9211 |
| π 2026-07-06 (Abama) | AnTuTu | 3314923 |
| π 2026-05-16 (PuzoTras) | AnTuTu | 3201580 |
| π 2026-04-11 -> w3infox | GeekBench GPU | 25182 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 15 | OriginOS 6 |
| OS updates | 4 years | - |
| Security updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (61% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:59 hr | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | 119Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Sony LYT-700C |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | - |
| Focal length | 73 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX480 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/3.09" (β 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 18 | - |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | - |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | August 2025 | October 2025 |
| Release date | August 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $425 | $370 |
| Successor | - Vivo V70 | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 100 W |
Further details
Notes on Vivo V60:
- Gold version weighs 200 g, blue 201 g, and the gray one is the lightest at 192 g. The heavier models use a glass back, while the gray version has a plastic one.
- Supports Bypass Charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 7
Related comparisons
10.
Vivo V60 vs Oppo Reno 14 (9)