Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo vs iQOO Z10

75 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
VS
66 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Z10

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (with MediaTek Dimensity 8400) that was released on April 28, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO Z10, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
  • Water-resistant body (IP65 classification)
  • 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2052K versus 1032K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Stereo speakers
  • 17% higher pixel density (453 vs 388 PPI)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • 41% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1639 and 1159 points

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and iQOO Z10 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
126.1
(Excellent)
Value Index
59.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.77 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1080 x 2392 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 453 ppi 388 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1300 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4400 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.3% 88.7%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 163.72 mm (6.45 inches) 163.4 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 75.88 mm (2.99 inches) 76.4 mm (3.01 inches)
Thickness 8.09 mm (0.32 inches) 7.93 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 212 g (7.48 oz) 199 g (7.02 oz)
Waterproof IP65 Yes
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material - Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Black, Gold, Orange Black, Silver
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
89.3%
88.7%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
Max clock 3250 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 1 core at 2.5 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
L3 cache 6 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MP7 Adreno 710
GPU shading units 896 256
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1050 MHz
FLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS ~537.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo and Vivo iQOO Z10
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1639
1159
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
6503
3291
Compute Score (GPU)
10325
4493
Compute Score (GPU) 10325 4493
Single-core score 1639 1159
Multi-core score 6503 3291
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2052566
1032527
CPU 631243 410611
GPU 652532 177682
Memory 298321 170977
UX 470470 273257
Total score 2052566 1032527
Samples [13 tests] [31 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1434
380
Stability 85% 98%
Graphics test 11 FPS 3 FPS
Graphics score 1434 380
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 24 FPS -
Section 1 26 FPS -
Section 2 25 FPS -
Section 3 21 FPS -
Graphics score 6345 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
iQOO Z10 +9%
10929
Web score 10089 9589
Video editing 5542 6313
Photo editing 19943 21985
Data manipulation 7493 8192
Writing score 11652 14177

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-26 (MαΊ‘nh)AnTuTu 112007569
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Niel)AnTuTu 112097730
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-08 (hazben)AnTuTu 112041814
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-27 (chouaib)AnTuTu 112102824
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-29 (ZYSX)AnTuTu 112021886
Vivo iQOO Z10
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-25 -> 1tZBagdkAnTuTu 111042579
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-11 (ПавСл)AnTuTu 111004436
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-10 (Artem)AnTuTu 111047355
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-28 (Matvey)AnTuTu 11998785
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-04 (Muhammad Rizky)AnTuTu 111077493

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory clock - 3200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM OriginOS 5 FuntouchOS 15

Battery

Capacity 7620 mAh 7300 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 23 min) Yes (50% in 33 min)
Full charging time 0:56 hr 1:13 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 32 megapixels
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.0
Sensor Sony IMX480 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.09" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced April 2025 April 2025
Release date April 2025 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $240 $255
Successor - Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 90 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
51 (86.4%)
8 (13.6%)
Total votes: 59

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!