Home > Smartphone comparison > iQOO Z11 Turbo vs K13 Turbo Pro – which one to choose?

Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

86 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
VS
77 out of 100
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.59-inch Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) that was released on January 15, 2026, against the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • 31% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3068K versus 2341K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Slow-motion recording at 240FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • 32% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2732 and 2068 points
  • The phone is 6 months newer
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Reasons to consider the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
102.5
(Excellent)
Value Index
132.7
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
iQOO Z11 Turbo
vs
K13 Turbo Pro

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2750 pixels 1280 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 466 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5500 nits -
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ No
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass AGC DT-Star D+
Screen-to-body ratio 90.8% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 157.61 mm (6.21 inches) 162.8 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 74.42 mm (2.93 inches) 77.2 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 8.3 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 202 g (7.13 oz) 208 g (7.34 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Active fan
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue, Pink Black, Silver, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
iQOO Z11 Turbo +1%
90.8%
K13 Turbo Pro
90.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Max clock 3800 MHz 3210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance
- 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime		 - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 829 Adreno 825
GPU shading units 1024 1024
GPU clock 1225 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~2508.8 GFLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
iQOO Z11 Turbo +32%
2732
K13 Turbo Pro
2068
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
iQOO Z11 Turbo +43%
9106
K13 Turbo Pro
6385
Compute Score (GPU)
iQOO Z11 Turbo +63%
21211
K13 Turbo Pro
13041
Compute Score (GPU) 21211 13041
Single-core score 2732 2068
Multi-core score 9106 6385
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
iQOO Z11 Turbo +31%
3068959
K13 Turbo Pro
2341700
CPU 926038 711180
GPU 1050943 825194
Memory 404976 301194
UX 687002 504132
Total score 3068959 2341700
Samples [16 tests] [25 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 64%
Graphics test 14 FPS 13 FPS
Graphics score 1823 1790
3DMark Solar Bay
iQOO Z11 Turbo +10%
9094
K13 Turbo Pro
8293
Graphics test 35 FPS 32 FPS
Section 1 40 FPS 35 FPS
Section 2 35 FPS 32 FPS
Section 3 29 FPS 27 FPS
Graphics score 9094 8293
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
iQOO Z11 Turbo +14%
18388
K13 Turbo Pro
16156
Web score 18849 18096
Video editing 7194 7532
Photo editing 40238 26855
Data manipulation 15237 14510
Writing score 25119 21062
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (87th and 175th place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 -> Vivo IqooAnTuTu3154986
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 (Π‘ΡƒΠ±Π°)AnTuTu3135649
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-02 -> paco_ratertaAnTuTu3075422
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Dior)AnTuTu2867447
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-21 -> paco_ratertaGeekBench CPU2732 / 9106
Add View all (17)
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (Dhdhd)AnTuTu2519399
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Dice Morgan)AnTuTu2348057
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (EXILER)AnTuTu2319105
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 -> Tushar_dmrcAnTuTu2323613
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-22 (Mr Rahman)AnTuTu2376220
Add View all (35)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 4800 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM OriginOS 6 ColorOS 15
OS updates 5 years -
Security updates 5 years -

Battery

Capacity 7600 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (50% in 27 min) Yes (63% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:56 hr 0:56 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12240 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital (lossless), 4x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 120 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 27 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP5 -
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) -
Pixel size 1 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Stabilization Digital -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 4920 x 3264
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length - 22 mm
Sensor GalaxyCore GC32E1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.1" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January 2026 July 2025
Release date January 2026 July 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $469 $359
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
12 (80%)
3 (20%)
Total votes: 15

Related comparisons

1. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
2. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
3. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Vivo T4 Ultra
4. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs OnePlus Ace 6T (5)
5. Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Vivo iQOO 15R (3)
6. Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7
7. Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Oppo K13 Turbo
8. Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
9. Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (2)
10. Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский