Home > Smartphone comparison > iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs iQOO Z9 Turbo – which one to choose?

Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs Z9 Turbo

72 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
VS
70 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3) that was released on January 3, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo, which is powered by the same chip and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
  • More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
  • The phone is 9 months newer

Review

Evaluation of Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance and Z9 Turbo crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
143.9
(Excellent)
Value Index
116.9
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
vs
iQOO Z9 Turbo

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 453 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.3% 89.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 163.7 mm (6.44 inches) 163.72 mm (6.45 inches)
Width 75.9 mm (2.99 inches) 75.88 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 7.98 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 196 g (6.91 oz) 194.9 g (6.87 oz)
Waterproof IP64 IP64
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue White, Black, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance and Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Max clock 3000 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 4 + 3) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4		 - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 735 Adreno 735
GPU shading units 768 768
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~1689.6 GFLOPS ~1689.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance and Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 10395
Single-core score 1945 1923
Multi-core score 5074 5179
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 604043 561691
GPU 517995 494831
Memory 272409 304465
UX 427498 444200
Total score 1821945 1805187
Samples [15 tests] [22 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 90%
Graphics test 8 FPS 8 FPS
Graphics score 1019 1077
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 18 FPS 19 FPS
Section 1 21 FPS 22 FPS
Section 2 18 FPS 19 FPS
Section 3 16 FPS 16 FPS
Graphics score 4851 4992
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability - 82%
Graphics test - 18 FPS
Graphics score - 3116
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9248 9868
Video editing 6129 6163
Photo editing 27796 26667
Data manipulation 13304 12299
Writing score 15427 14966
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 -> sajidulchAnTuTu 111706345
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (AngryDuy)AnTuTu 111821945
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-11 (Itz Moinul)AnTuTu 111724665
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (ratura edit)AnTuTu 111943149
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-01 (iqoouseR)AnTuTu 111907892
Add View all (15)
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (Art1452)AnTuTu 111599837
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-25 (Plambi)AnTuTu 111742157
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-26 (Kostelom42)AnTuTu 111745140
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-20 (Alex777)AnTuTu 111836521
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-18 (Subaru)AnTuTu 111758061
Add View all (25)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4200 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 14
ROM OriginOS 5 OriginOS 4
OS updates 3 years 3 years
Security updates 4 years 4 years

Battery

Capacity 6400 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 15 min) Yes (50% in 17 min)
Full charging time 0:43 hr 0:39 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor GalaxyCore GC08A3 GalaxyCore GC08A3
Sensor size 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.5
Sensor Samsung S5K3P9 Samsung S5K3P9
Sensor size 1/3.0" (β‰ˆ 0.33 inch) 1/3.0" (β‰ˆ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January 2025 April 2024
Release date January 2025 April 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $260 $375
Successor - - Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
199 (82.9%)
41 (17.1%)
Total votes: 240

Related comparisons

1. Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
2. Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
3. Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (2)
4. Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
5. Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo vs Vivo iQOO Neo 9 (2)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский