Home > Smartphone comparison > Redmi Turbo 4 vs iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance – which one to choose?

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance

74 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
VS
73 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (with MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra) that was released on January 2, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • 17% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1945 and 1657 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
127.9
(Excellent)
Value Index
148.5
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Redmi Turbo 4
vs
iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 446 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1400 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 88.7% 89.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 160.95 mm (6.34 inches) 163.7 mm (6.44 inches)
Width 75.24 mm (2.96 inches) 75.9 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 8.06 mm (0.32 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 203.5 g (7.18 oz) 196 g (6.91 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP64
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Plastic
Frame material - Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue White, Black, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Max clock 3250 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725		 - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MC7 Adreno 735
GPU shading units 896 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS ~1689.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 12787 -
Single-core score 1657 1945
Multi-core score 6515 5074
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 618604 604043
GPU 559260 517995
Memory 302969 272409
UX 479912 427498
Total score 1960745 1821945
Samples [25 tests] [15 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 86% -
Graphics test 10 FPS 8 FPS
Graphics score 1346 1019
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 23 FPS 18 FPS
Section 1 25 FPS 21 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 18 FPS
Section 3 20 FPS 16 FPS
Graphics score 5948 4851
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14034 9248
Video editing 6661 6129
Photo editing 23584 27796
Data manipulation 13175 13304
Writing score 17637 15427
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (tadslj)AnTuTu 111988365
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (Vyx)AnTuTu 112023750
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Siam)AnTuTu 112105375
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Emon)AnTuTu 112063678
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Dreamy πŸ”Έ)AnTuTu 112149895
Add View all (31)
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 -> sajidulchAnTuTu 111706345
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (AngryDuy)AnTuTu 111821945
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-11 (Itz Moinul)AnTuTu 111724665
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (ratura edit)AnTuTu 111943149
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-01 (iqoouseR)AnTuTu 111907892
Add View all (15)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM HyperOS 2.0 OriginOS 5
OS updates - 3 years
Security updates - 4 years

Battery

Capacity 6550 mAh 6400 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 19 min) Yes (50% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:46 hr 0:43 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution - 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Smartsens SC820CS GalaxyCore GC08A3
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.5
Focal length 25 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV20B Samsung S5K3P9
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/3.0" (β‰ˆ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January 2025 January 2025
Release date January 2025 January 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $400 $260
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4. It has a better gaming, connectivity, software, design, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
14 (24.1%)
44 (75.9%)
Total votes: 58

Related comparisons

1. Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
2. Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
3. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (9)
4. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro (1)
5. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
6. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi K80
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский