Vivo T4 Ultra vs T4 Pro
76
out of 100
VS
69
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo T4 Ultra (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 11, 2025, against the Vivo T4 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo T4 Ultra
- 89% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2286K versus 1213K)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- 19% higher pixel density (460 vs 388 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
- 82% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2252 and 1234 points
Reasons to consider the Vivo T4 Pro
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5500 mAh
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.77 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1080 x 2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 1500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Diamond Shield Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 88% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 160.56 mm (6.32 inches) | 163.53 mm (6.44 inches) |
| Width | 75 mm (2.95 inches) | 76.96 mm (3.03 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.45 mm (0.29 inches) | 7.53 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP64 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gold, Gray | Gold, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720) - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 722 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~1177.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 14713 | 6746 |
| Single-core score | 2252 | 1234 |
| Multi-core score | 6749 | 3487 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 728686 | 465578 |
| GPU | 750320 | 250080 |
| Memory | 291780 | 167467 |
| UX | 516022 | 329878 |
| Total score | 2286808 | 1213003 |
| Samples | [3 tests] | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 10076 |
| Video editing | - | 6267 |
| Photo editing | - | 23896 |
| Data manipulation | - | 8736 |
| Writing score | - | 13217 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#191st place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo T4 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-19 (Olliver1006) | AnTuTu | 2348248 |
| π 2026-02-09 (Forhad) | AnTuTu | 1890510 |
| π 2026-01-06 (Bumble bee) | AnTuTu | 2286808 |
Vivo T4 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-07 (Andheri) | AnTuTu | 1252296 |
| π 2026-02-28 (Zeldris) | AnTuTu | 1213003 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 15 | Funtouch OS 15 |
Battery
| Capacity | 5500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 20 min) | Yes (68% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:48 hr | 0:50 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | 120Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Depth |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 73 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | - | 30 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | August 2025 |
| Release date | June 2025 | August 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $450 | $310 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 90 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo T4 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 11