Home > Smartphone comparison > T4 Ultra vs Edge 60 Pro – which one to choose?

Vivo T4 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro

76 out of 100
Vivo T4 Ultra
VS
73 out of 100
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Vivo T4 Ultra
Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo T4 Ultra (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 11, 2025, against the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo T4 Ultra
  • 32% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2286K versus 1726K)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 59% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2252 and 1412 points
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 60 Pro
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo T4 Ultra and Motorola Edge 60 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
92.6
(Very good)
Value Index
68.0
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
T4 Ultra
vs
Edge 60 Pro

Display

Type AMOLED POLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1220 x 2712 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 460 ppi 444 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 89.2% 92.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.3%
PWM - 715 Hz
Response time - 10 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
T4 Ultra
n/a
Edge 60 Pro
1606 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.56 mm (6.32 inches) 160.69 mm (6.33 inches)
Width 75 mm (2.95 inches) 73.06 mm (2.88 inches)
Thickness 7.45 mm (0.29 inches) 8.24 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 192 g (6.77 oz) 186 g (6.56 oz)
Waterproof IP64 IP69
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Gold, Gray Blue, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.58/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
T4 Ultra
89.2%
Edge 60 Pro +3%
92.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo T4 Ultra and Motorola Edge 60 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme
Max clock 3400 MHz 3350 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4		 - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 MediaTek APU 780
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G615 MPΠ—6
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1400 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo T4 Ultra and Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
T4 Ultra +59%
2252
Edge 60 Pro
1412
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
T4 Ultra +51%
6749
Edge 60 Pro
4471
Compute Score (GPU)
T4 Ultra +62%
14713
Edge 60 Pro
9102
Compute Score (GPU) 14713 9102
Single-core score 2252 1412
Multi-core score 6749 4471
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
T4 Ultra +32%
2286808
Edge 60 Pro
1726985
CPU 728686 493624
GPU 750320 499506
Memory 291780 307893
UX 516022 425962
Total score 2286808 1726985
Samples [3 tests] [13 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 41%
Graphics test - 9 FPS
Graphics score - 1226
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 19 FPS
Section 1 - 21 FPS
Section 2 - 19 FPS
Section 3 - 17 FPS
Graphics score - 4997
Sources: 3DMark [5]
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#200th place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo T4 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Purushotam Prajapat)AnTuTu 122403705
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (Olliver1006)AnTuTu 112348248
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-09 (Forhad)AnTuTu 111890510
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-06 (Bumble bee)AnTuTu 112286808
Add View all (4)
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Bishal Chowdhury)AnTuTu 111505912
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Gord)AnTuTu 111752404
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Fenqndo)AnTuTu 111763577
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-28 -> Rupeshk.dAnTuTu 111726985
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Rio)AnTuTu 111709747
Add View all (18)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM Funtouch OS 15 Hello UI
OS updates - 6 years

Battery

Capacity 5500 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 20 min) Yes (81% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 0:44 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 12:38 hr
Watching video - 12:21 hr
Gaming - 07:03 hr
Standby - 102 hr
General battery life
T4 Ultra
n/a
Edge 60 Pro
24:17 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 120Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 Sony LYT-700C
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 10 MP
Aperture f/2.6 -
Focal length 85 mm 73 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Samsung S5K3K1
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/3.94" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Sensor - Samsung JNS
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution - 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.0
Sensor CMOS Samsung JNS
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
T4 Ultra
n/a
Edge 60 Pro
88.1 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced June 2025 April 2025
Release date June 2025 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $450 $599
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance and gaming are more important to you, then choose the Vivo T4 Ultra. But if the battery life, connectivity, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Motorola Edge 60 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
4 (80%)
1 (20%)
Total votes: 5

Related comparisons

1. Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Motorola Edge 60 (3)
2. Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro
3. Vivo T4 Ultra vs Vivo V60
4. Vivo T4 Ultra vs Vivo V50 5G
5. Vivo T4 Ultra vs Vivo T4 5G
6. Vivo T4 Ultra vs Vivo X200 FE
7. Vivo T4 Ultra vs Vivo T3 Ultra
8. Vivo T4 Ultra vs OnePlus 13R
9. Vivo T4 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 14
10. Vivo T4 Ultra vs OnePlus Nord 5
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский