Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Oppo K13 Turbo
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.77-inch Vivo V60 Lite 5G (with Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo) that was released on September 24, 2025, against the Oppo K13 Turbo, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8450 and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo V60 Lite 5G
- Water-resistant body (IP65 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
Reasons to consider the Oppo K13 Turbo
- 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1990K versus 925K)
- 17% higher pixel density (453 vs 388 PPI)
- Reverse charging feature
- 58% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1612 and 1023 points
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels | 1280 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 388 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | - | 1600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3000 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | AGC DT-Star D+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 90.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 163.77 mm (6.45 inches) | 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) |
| Width | 76.28 mm (3 inches) | 77.2 mm (3.04 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.59 mm (0.3 inches) | 8.3 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP65 | IPX9 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Active fan |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | White, Black, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 |
| Max clock | 2500 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 655 | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 896 |
| GPU clock | 1047 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~536.1 GFLOPS | ~2329.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2525 | 12321 |
| Single-core score | 1023 | 1612 |
| Multi-core score | 2817 | 6210 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 329195 | 624873 |
| GPU | 123225 | 647052 |
| Memory | 201306 | 256266 |
| UX | 271683 | 461908 |
| Total score | 925409 | 1990099 |
| Samples | [22 tests] | [15 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | 11 FPS |
| Graphics score | 343 | 1467 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 25 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 27 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 25 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 22 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 6549 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 9715 | 17107 |
| Video editing | 5376 | 6366 |
| Photo editing | 20140 | 31941 |
| Data manipulation | 8280 | 10037 |
| Writing score | 15297 | 19003 |
Recent User Tests
Vivo V60 Lite 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-05 (rafxz) | AnTuTu 11 | 923163 |
| π 2026-07-04 (Vee957) | AnTuTu 11 | 933084 |
| π 2026-06-17 (Ijoi) | AnTuTu 11 | 949226 |
| π 2026-06-11 (tuannguyen) | AnTuTu 11 | 920896 |
| π 2026-04-23 (Saito Akio) | AnTuTu 11 | 938373 |
Oppo K13 Turbo
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-27 -> AndroSid | Geekbench 7 GPU | 9846 |
| π 2026-09-27 -> AndroSid | Geekbench 7 GPU | 9347 |
| π 2026-09-27 -> AndroSid | Geekbench 7 CPU | 1034 / 5083 |
| π 2026-08-19 -> AndroSid | Geekbench 6 GPU | 12587 |
| π 2026-08-19 -> AndroSid | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1612 / 6210 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 15 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 21 min) | Yes (63% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:52 hr | 0:56 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 120 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | - | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4920 x 3264 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1" (β 0.32 inch) | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | - |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | July 2025 |
| Release date | September 2025 | July 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $340 | $305 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo K13 Turbo is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 4