Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Oppo K13 Turbo

65 out of 100
Vivo V60 Lite 5G
VS
72 out of 100
Oppo K13 Turbo

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.77-inch Vivo V60 Lite 5G (with Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo) that was released on September 24, 2025, against the Oppo K13 Turbo, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8450 and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo V60 Lite 5G
  • Water-resistant body (IP65 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
Reasons to consider the Oppo K13 Turbo
  • 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1990K versus 925K)
  • 17% higher pixel density (453 vs 388 PPI)
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 58% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1612 and 1023 points
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of Vivo V60 Lite 5G and Oppo K13 Turbo crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
91.6
(Very good)
Value Index
113.7
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.77 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2392 pixels 1280 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 388 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3000 nits -
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ No
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass AGC DT-Star D+
Screen-to-body ratio 88.6% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 163.77 mm (6.45 inches) 162.8 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 76.28 mm (3 inches) 77.2 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 7.59 mm (0.3 inches) 8.3 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 194 g (6.84 oz) 207 g (7.3 oz)
Waterproof IP65 IPX9
Advanced cooling - Active fan
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black, Blue, Pink White, Black, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
88.6%
K13 Turbo +2%
90.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo V60 Lite 5G and Oppo K13 Turbo
SoC
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 8450
Max clock 2500 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
L3 cache 4 MB 6 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 655 MediaTek NPU 880
GPU
Graphics Mali-G615 MP2 Mali-G720 MP7
GPU shading units 256 896
GPU clock 1047 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~536.1 GFLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo V60 Lite 5G and Oppo K13 Turbo
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
K13 Turbo +58%
1612
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
K13 Turbo +120%
6210
Compute Score (GPU)
K13 Turbo +388%
12321
Compute Score (GPU) 2525 12321
Single-core score 1023 1612
Multi-core score 2817 6210
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
925409
K13 Turbo +115%
1990099
CPU 329195 624873
GPU 123225 647052
Memory 201306 256266
UX 271683 461908
Total score 925409 1990099
Samples [22 tests] [15 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
K13 Turbo +328%
1467
Graphics test 3 FPS 11 FPS
Graphics score 343 1467
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 25 FPS
Section 1 - 27 FPS
Section 2 - 25 FPS
Section 3 - 22 FPS
Graphics score - 6549
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
10678
K13 Turbo +37%
14601
Web score 9715 17107
Video editing 5376 6366
Photo editing 20140 31941
Data manipulation 8280 10037
Writing score 15297 19003

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo V60 Lite 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (rafxz)AnTuTu 11923163
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (Vee957)AnTuTu 11933084
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-17 (Ijoi)AnTuTu 11949226
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-11 (tuannguyen)AnTuTu 11920896
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (Saito Akio)AnTuTu 11938373
Oppo K13 Turbo
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> AndroSidGeekbench 7 GPU9846
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> AndroSidGeekbench 7 GPU9347
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> AndroSidGeekbench 7 CPU1034 / 5083
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 -> AndroSidGeekbench 6 GPU12587
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 -> AndroSidGeekbench 6 CPU1612 / 6210

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 2133 MHz -
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM Funtouch OS 15 ColorOS 15

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 21 min) Yes (63% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:52 hr 0:56 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Quad LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion - 120 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length - 27 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Stabilization Digital -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution - 4920 x 3264
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.4
Focal length 22 mm 22 mm
Sensor - CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.1" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) -
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No -

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced September 2025 July 2025
Release date September 2025 July 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $340 $305
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo K13 Turbo is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2 (50%)
2 (50%)
Total votes: 4

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!