Vivo X200 FE vs Vivo V60

78 out of 100
Vivo X200 FE
VS
69 out of 100
Vivo V60

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 FE (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 23, 2025, against the Vivo V60, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
  • 70% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2140K versus 1257K)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • 19% higher pixel density (461 vs 388 PPI)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 77% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2209 and 1247 points
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 5.16 mm narrower
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo V60
  • Has a 0.46 inch larger screen size

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 FE and Vivo V60 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
76*
75*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
77
83*
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
78*
69*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
31.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
79.9
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.77 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1080 x 2392 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 461 ppi 388 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Schott Xensation Core Schott Xensation Core
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 88%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 360 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Vivo V60
6.77β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
X200 FE
6.31β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1766 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) 163.53 mm (6.44 inches)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) 76.96 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 7.69 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight 186 g (6.56 oz) 192 g (6.77 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow Gold, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.99/5) -
Drop resistance Good (C) Β· 100 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
X200 FE +3%
90.3%
88%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 FE and Vivo V60
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Max clock 3400 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520)
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720)
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720)
L3 cache 8 MB 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 722
GPU shading units 1536 512
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~1177.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 FE and Vivo V60
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
X200 FE +77%
2209
1247
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
X200 FE +104%
7239
3557
Compute Score (GPU)
X200 FE +133%
15299
6568
Compute Score (GPU) 15299 6568
Single-core score 2209 1247
Multi-core score 7239 3557
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
X200 FE +70%
2140421
1257854
CPU 662181 474474
GPU 664075 253163
Memory 295511 184094
UX 518654 346123
Total score 2140421 1257854
Samples [10 tests] [9 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
X200 FE +134%
1561
667
Stability 65% 98%
Graphics test 12 FPS 5 FPS
Graphics score 1561 667
3DMark Solar Bay
6745
n/a
Graphics test 26 FPS -
Section 1 28 FPS -
Section 2 26 FPS -
Section 3 22 FPS -
Graphics score 6745 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
X200 FE +23%
13962
11318
Web score 13991 8850
Video editing 5556 6242
Photo editing 26454 23969
Data manipulation 12139 10504
Writing score 21943 13580

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenь)AnTuTu2148340
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95)AnTuTu2306009
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-14 (ShaSha)AnTuTu2235448
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Pranav)AnTuTu2140421
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder)AnTuTu1793939
Vivo V60
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-07 (Aman Sthapak)AnTuTu1250792
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-14 (CrustyName)GeekBench GPU6568
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-14 (CrustyName)GeekBench CPU1247 / 3557
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-23 (Dodi)AnTuTu1231015
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-21 (Dodi)AnTuTu1221047

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory clock - 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM Funtouch 15 Funtouch OS 15
OS size 57 GB -
OS updates 3 years 4 years
Security updates 4 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (48% in 30 min) Yes (61% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:58 hr 0:59 hr
Battery cycles 800 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:34 hr -
Watching video 15:00 hr -
Gaming 07:21 hr -
Standby 108 hr -
General battery life
25:14 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 120Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 Sony IMX766
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.7
Focal length 70 mm 73 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV08D10 Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 18
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.1 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced June 2025 August 2025
Release date July 2025 August 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $650 $425
Successor - Vivo X300 FE - Vivo V70
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 90 W
Further details
Notes on Vivo V60:
    - Gold version weighs 200 g, blue 201 g, and the gray one is the lightest at 192 g. The heavier models use a glass back, while the gray version has a plastic one.
    - Supports Bypass Charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X200 FE is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
50 (68.5%)
23 (31.5%)
Total votes: 73

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!