Vivo X200 FE vs Vivo V60
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 FE (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 23, 2025, against the Vivo V60, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- 70% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2140K versus 1257K)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 19% higher pixel density (461 vs 388 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 77% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2209 and 1247 points
- Better grip in hands β the body is 5.16 mm narrower
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo V60
- Has a 0.46 inch larger screen size
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 inches | 6.77 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1080 x 2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 461 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Schott Xensation Core | Schott Xensation Core |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 88% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 360 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | β Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
Vivo V60
6.77β³ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
X200 FE
6.31β³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) | 163.53 mm (6.44 inches) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) | 76.96 mm (3.03 inches) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.69 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow | Gold, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.99/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) Β· 100 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720) - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 722 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~1177.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15299 | 6568 |
| Single-core score | 2209 | 1247 |
| Multi-core score | 7239 | 3557 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 662181 | 474474 |
| GPU | 664075 | 253163 |
| Memory | 295511 | 184094 |
| UX | 518654 | 346123 |
| Total score | 2140421 | 1257854 |
| Samples | [10 tests] | [9 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 65% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 12 FPS | 5 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1561 | 667 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 26 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 28 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 26 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 22 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 6745 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13991 | 8850 |
| Video editing | 5556 | 6242 |
| Photo editing | 26454 | 23969 |
| Data manipulation | 12139 | 10504 |
| Writing score | 21943 | 13580 |
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenΡ) | AnTuTu | 2148340 |
| π 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95) | AnTuTu | 2306009 |
| π 2026-06-14 (ShaSha) | AnTuTu | 2235448 |
| π 2026-06-04 (Pranav) | AnTuTu | 2140421 |
| π 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder) | AnTuTu | 1793939 |
Vivo V60
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-07 (Aman Sthapak) | AnTuTu | 1250792 |
| π 2026-05-14 (CrustyName) | GeekBench GPU | 6568 |
| π 2026-05-14 (CrustyName) | GeekBench CPU | 1247 / 3557 |
| π 2026-03-23 (Dodi) | AnTuTu | 1231015 |
| π 2026-03-21 (Dodi) | AnTuTu | 1221047 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | Funtouch 15 | Funtouch OS 15 |
| OS size | 57 GB | - |
| OS updates | 3 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (48% in 30 min) | Yes (61% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:58 hr | 0:59 hr |
| Battery cycles | 800 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 11:34 hr | - |
| Watching video | 15:00 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:21 hr | - |
| Standby | 108 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 120Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony IMX766 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 73 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08D10 | Omnivision OV08D10 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44" (β 0.29 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | August 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | August 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $650 | $425 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 FE | - Vivo V70 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 90 W |
Further details
Notes on Vivo V60:
- Gold version weighs 200 g, blue 201 g, and the gray one is the lightest at 192 g. The heavier models use a glass back, while the gray version has a plastic one.
- Supports Bypass Charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X200 FE is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 73
Related comparisons
1.
Vivo X200 FE vs OnePlus 13s (2)
8.
Vivo V60 vs Oppo Reno 14 (9)