Home > Smartphone comparison > Vivo X200s vs Vivo X100s – which one to choose?

Vivo X200s vs Vivo X100s

84 out of 100
Vivo X200s
VS
74 out of 100
Vivo X100s
Vivo X200s
Vivo X100s

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo X200s (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on April 21, 2025, against the Vivo X100s, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200s
  • Comes with 1100 mAh larger battery capacity: 6200 vs 5100 mAh
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
  • 27% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2830K versus 2233K)
  • The phone is 11 months newer
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • 29% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2949 and 2284 points
Reasons to consider the Vivo X100s
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200s and Vivo X100s crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
37.8
(Mediocre)
Value Index
52.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Vivo X200s
vs
Vivo X100s

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 460 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 3000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate - 300 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 89.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 160.01 mm (6.3 inches) 164.12 mm (6.46 inches)
Width 74.29 mm (2.92 inches) 75.78 mm (2.98 inches)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) 7.8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 205 g (7.23 oz) 203 g (7.16 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray, Purple White, Silver, Gray, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200s +1%
90.3%
Vivo X100s
89.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200s and Vivo X100s
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
Max clock 3730 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925		 - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek NPU 790
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Immortalis-G720 MC12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200s and Vivo X100s
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200s +29%
2949
Vivo X100s
2284
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200s +21%
9258
Vivo X100s
7661
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 15126
Single-core score 2949 2284
Multi-core score 9258 7661
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X200s +27%
2830117
Vivo X100s
2233931
CPU 884954 755466
GPU 992618 792275
Memory 326902 357304
UX 625643 328886
Total score 2830117 2233931
Samples [3 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo X200s +27%
2279
Vivo X100s
1791
Stability 69% 69%
Graphics test 17 FPS 13 FPS
Graphics score 2279 1791
3DMark Solar Bay
Vivo X200s +37%
10222
Vivo X100s
7478
Graphics test 39 FPS 28 FPS
Section 1 43 FPS 32 FPS
Section 2 39 FPS 29 FPS
Section 3 33 FPS 25 FPS
Graphics score 10222 7478
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Graphics score 5777 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X200s
14135
Vivo X100s +1%
14255
Web score 16357 12141
Video editing 5669 5576
Photo editing 28806 29738
Data manipulation 11557 12937
Writing score 18280 22352
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#131st place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200s
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-03-13 (q1spiwu)AnTuTu 112970142
📘 2025-11-05 (Tyra)AnTuTu 112830117
📘 2025-09-18 (agu)AnTuTu 112727427
Add View all (3)
Vivo X100s
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-11 (Tuấn Nguyễ🇻🇳)AnTuTu 122637244
📘 2025-11-12 (Huan)AnTuTu 112233931
Add View all (2)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14
ROM OriginOS 6 OriginOS 4
OS updates - 3 years
Security updates - 3 years

Battery

Capacity 6200 mAh 5100 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (70% in 30 min) Yes (60% in 16 min)
Full charging time 0:54 hr 0:33 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 64 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX921 Sony IMX920
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 64 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.6
Focal length 70 mm 70 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Omnivision OV64B
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 20 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 Samsung S5KGD2
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.8 micron
Autofocus - No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes -
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - Yes

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced April 2025 May 2024
Release date April 2025 May 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $600 $699
Successor - - Vivo X200s
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X200s is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
5 (50%)
5 (50%)
Total votes: 10

Related comparisons

1. Vivo X200s vs Vivo X200 Pro
2. Vivo X200s vs Vivo X200 FE
3. Vivo X200s vs Vivo X200 Pro mini
4. Vivo X200s vs Vivo X200 Ultra
5. Vivo X200s vs Vivo X200
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский