Vivo X300 E vs iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

87 out of 100
Vivo X300 E
VS
90 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.59-inch Vivo X300 E (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) that was released on July 27, 2026, against the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9500M and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 E
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Weighs 25 grams less
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
  • Comes with 1900 mAh larger battery capacity: 9100 vs 7200 mAh
  • 24% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3579K versus 2886K)
  • 12% higher pixel density (514 vs 459 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • 29% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3633 and 2813 points

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 E and iQOO Neo 11 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
68.6
(Good)
Value Index
115.8
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.83 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2750 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.8:9
PPI 459 ppi 514 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 500 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.1% 91.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 157.5 mm (6.2 inches) 163.4 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 74.3 mm (2.93 inches) 75.9 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 7.8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.6 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 200 g (7.05 oz) 225 g (7.94 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Gray, Orange White, Black, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 E and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
Max clock 3800 MHz 4210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance
- 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
L3 cache 6 MB 16 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 990
GPU
Graphics Adreno 829 Mali-G1 Ultra MP11
GPU shading units 1024 1408
GPU clock 1225 MHz 1716 MHz
FLOPS ~2508.8 GFLOPS ~4832.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 E and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2813
3633
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
9056
11035
Compute Score (GPU)
17022
23753
Compute Score (GPU) 17022 23753
Single-core score 2813 3633
Multi-core score 9056 11035
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2886527
3579952
CPU 887251 983039
GPU 951094 1327484
Memory 384303 460333
UX 663879 809096
Total score 2886527 3579952
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (113th and 35th place)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 OriginOS 6
OS updates - 4 years
Security updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 7200 mAh 9100 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes
Full charging time - 1:20 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 110° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.9
Focal length - 23 mm
Sensor - Sony LYT-700C
Sensor size - 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size - 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/2.6 -
Focal length 70 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX882 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 21 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX480
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/3.09" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced July 2026 August 2026
Release date July 2026 August 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $710 $505
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra. But if the camera is more of a priority – go for the Vivo X300 E.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!