Vivo X300 Pro vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
90
out of 100
VS
80
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X300 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL, which is powered by Google Tensor G5 and came out 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Pro
- 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3587K versus 1617K)
- Comes with 1310 mAh larger battery capacity: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
- Shows 7% longer battery life (24:37 vs 23:06 hours)
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 45W)
- Delivers 14% higher peak brightness (2662 against 2340 nits)
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- 40% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3228 and 2305 points
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
- The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
- Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
- More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1344 x 2992 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 452 ppi | 486 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 2000 nits | 3300 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 2200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Armor Glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 89.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 99.7% | 96.2% |
| PWM | 360 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 3 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.98 mm (6.38 inches) | 162.8 mm (6.41 inches) |
| Width | 75.48 mm (2.97 inches) | 76.6 mm (3.02 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.5 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 232 g (8.18 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Brown | White, Black, Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3/5) | Good (3.66/5) |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 180 drops | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Google Tensor G5 |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 3780 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 5 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 2 cores at 2.25 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 5 cores at 3.05 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.78 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | PowerVR DXT-48-1536 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27383 | 3760 |
| Single-core score | 3228 | 2305 |
| Multi-core score | 9553 | 6054 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1046355 | 760240 |
| GPU | 1382122 | 181200 |
| Memory | 388628 | 267804 |
| UX | 770724 | 408462 |
| Total score | 3587829 | 1617706 |
| Samples | [28 tests] | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 53% | 93% |
| Graphics test | 22 FPS | 8 FPS |
| Graphics score | 3036 | 1012 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 51 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 57 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 51 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 45 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 13426 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14329 | 17237 |
| Video editing | 6016 | 7203 |
| Photo editing | 36698 | 24584 |
| Data manipulation | 14869 | 14036 |
| Writing score | 25904 | 20213 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#46th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X300 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-27 (Pradip) | AnTuTu 12 | 3930709 |
| 📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix) | CPU Throttle | 81% |
| 📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix) | AnTuTu 12 | 4215102 |
| 📘 2026-09-03 (chapix) | AnTuTu 11 | 3935655 |
| 📘 2026-08-28 -> Rlamac012 | AnTuTu 11 | 3729488 |
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-25 (Dolbaeb) | AnTuTu 12 | 1549159 |
| 📘 2026-07-16 (fox_sky) | AnTuTu 11 | 1629394 |
| 📘 2026-06-05 (dunkiegaming) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 4116 |
| 📘 2026-06-05 (dunkiegaming) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2295 / 6133 |
| 📘 2026-05-17 (Dustigen) | AnTuTu 11 | 1487891 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 (Can be upgraded to Android 17) |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | Stock Android |
| OS size | 37 GB | 23 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 7 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6510 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (23 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (55% in 24 min) | Yes (59% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:50 hr | 1:22 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 13:30 hr | 11:06 hr |
| Watching video | 15:47 hr | 17:14 hr |
| Gaming | 07:14 hr | 05:08 hr |
| Standby | 81 hr | 81 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8160 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119° | 123° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 48 MP 3) Ultrawide: 48 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-828 | Samsung GNV |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 113 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HPB | Samsung S5KGM5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5KGM5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 180 | 160 |
| Zoom | 159 | 141 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X300 Pro from DxOMark | Photo samples of Google Pixel 10 Pro XL from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 17 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX858 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2025 | August 2025 |
| Release date | October 2025 | August 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $1199 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Pixel 10 Pro XL:
- Supports Bypass Charge.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X300 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 73
Related comparisons
10.
Vivo X300 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra (5)