Vivo X300 Ultra vs X300 Pro
93
out of 100
VS
90
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X300 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Vivo X300 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9500 and came out 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Shows 19% longer battery life (29:11 vs 24:37 hours)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Delivers 27% higher peak brightness (3309 against 2611 nits)
- 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4247K versus 3587K)
- 13% higher pixel density (510 vs 452 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 17% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3784 and 3228 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-144 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 2000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Armor glass | Armor Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 99.7% |
| PWM | 110 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.98 mm (6.42 inches) | 161.98 mm (6.38 inches) |
| Width | 76.81 mm (3.02 inches) | 75.48 mm (2.97 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 232 g (8.18 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Green | White, Black, Blue, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3/5) | Good (3/5) |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 180 drops | Very good (B) · 180 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max clock | 4608 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27357 | 27383 |
| Single-core score | 3784 | 3228 |
| Multi-core score | 11394 | 9553 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1192014 | 1046355 |
| GPU | 1543938 | 1382122 |
| Memory | 525105 | 388628 |
| UX | 986376 | 770724 |
| Total score | 4247433 | 3587829 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [28 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 53% |
| Graphics test | - | 22 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 3036 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 51 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 57 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 51 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 45 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 13426 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 14329 |
| Video editing | - | 6016 |
| Photo editing | - | 36698 |
| Data manipulation | - | 14869 |
| Writing score | - | 25904 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (10th and 38th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X300 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-12 (InphaseCosine18) | AnTuTu 12 | 4098185 |
| 📘 2026-09-06 (Dipshit6769) | AnTuTu 11 | 3835023 |
| 📘 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3784 / 11394 |
| 📘 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF) | AnTuTu 11 | 4175239 |
| 📘 2026-04-28 (Razor97FF) | AnTuTu 11 | 4247433 |
Vivo X300 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix) | CPU Throttle | 81% |
| 📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix) | AnTuTu 12 | 4215102 |
| 📘 2026-09-03 (chapix) | AnTuTu 11 | 3935655 |
| 📘 2026-08-28 -> Rlamac012 | AnTuTu 11 | 3729488 |
| 📘 2026-08-16 (chapix) | AnTuTu 11 | 3884886 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | OriginOS 6 |
| OS size | 60 GB | 37 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6600 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (66% in 30 min) | Yes (55% in 24 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:46 hr | 0:50 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | 10:18 hr | 13:30 hr |
| Watching video | 20:51 hr | 15:47 hr |
| Gaming | 06:43 hr | 07:14 hr |
| Standby | 137 hr | 81 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#59th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12256 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 116° | 119° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 35 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-901 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12" (≈ 0.89 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP0 | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 180 | 180 |
| Zoom | 172 | 159 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X300 Ultra from DxOMark | Photo samples of Vivo X300 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March 2026 | October 2025 |
| Release date | April 2026 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $899 |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 1.29 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo X300 Ultra. It has a better display, battery life, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 307
