Vivo X300 vs OnePlus Ace 6T
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X300 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the OnePlus Ace 6T, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Handles wireless charging up to 40W
- Better grip in hands – the body is 5.12 mm narrower
- Weighs 21 grams less
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Ace 6T
- Has a 0.52 inch larger screen size
- Comes with 2260 mAh larger battery capacity: 8300 vs 6040 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
- Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels | 1272 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.8:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 2000 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 3600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Reinforced Glass | Crystal Shield Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 360 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
Ace 6T
6.83″ (19.8:9 ratio) = 17.6 in2
Vivo X300
6.31″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~15% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.57 mm (5.93 inches) | 163.41 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 71.92 mm (2.83 inches) | 77.04 mm (3.03 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.95 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red, Pink, Purple | Black, Green, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 180 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 3840 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance - 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Adreno 829 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 1225 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~2508.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 25501 | 21241 |
| Single-core score | 3204 | 3057 |
| Multi-core score | 9874 | 10447 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 981387 | 924772 |
| GPU | 1256247 | 1009895 |
| Memory | 364630 | 394779 |
| UX | 728537 | 718188 |
| Total score | 3330801 | 3047634 |
| Samples | [25 tests] | [15 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 57% | - |
| Graphics test | 23 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3119 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 49 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 56 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 48 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 42 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 12817 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14375 | - |
| Video editing | 5995 | - |
| Photo editing | 34571 | - |
| Data manipulation | 12159 | - |
| Writing score | 22695 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (49th and 92nd place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X300
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-16 (Asura) | CPU Throttle | 70% |
| 📘 2026-09-07 (Asura) | CPU Throttle | 63% |
| 📘 2026-08-23 (vakiho) | AnTuTu | 3455310 |
| 📘 2026-08-22 -> Asura | AnTuTu | 3524597 |
| 📘 2026-08-12 (burmalda) | AnTuTu | 3363428 |
OnePlus Ace 6T
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-30 (dogityx) | AnTuTu | 2693734 |
| 📘 2026-08-28 (AYMAN TOTOO) | AnTuTu | 3053526 |
| 📘 2026-08-18 (K1r1eshcka) | AnTuTu | 2918664 |
| 📘 2026-07-08 (Mike) | AnTuTu | 3308014 |
| 📘 2026-05-25 (ndke) | GeekBench GPU | 21241 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | ColorOS 16 |
| OS updates | 5 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | - | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6040 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (67% in 30 min) | Yes (58% in 23 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:48 hr | 0:57 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 12:36 hr | - |
| Watching video | 20:41 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:52 hr | - |
| Standby | 107 hr | - |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#81st place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12288 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.68 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HPB | Sony IMX906 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | - |
| Focal length | 70 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-602 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | - |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Omnivision OV08D10 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX480 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/3.09" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2025 | December 2025 |
| Release date | October 2025 | December 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, gaming, connectivity, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X300. But if the battery life and software are more of a priority – go for the OnePlus Ace 6T.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 12
Related comparisons
1.
Vivo X300 vs Vivo X300 Pro (3)