Home > Smartphone comparison > Vivo X300 vs Vivo X200 – which one to choose?

Vivo X300 vs Vivo X200

89 out of 100
Vivo X300
VS
81 out of 100
Vivo X200
Vivo X300
Vivo X200

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X300 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Vivo X200, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 1 year before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300
  • Delivers 70% higher peak brightness (2685 against 1577 nits)
  • Shows 24% longer battery life (28:23 vs 22:51 hours)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3330K versus 2727K)
  • The phone is 1 year newer
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • 19% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3204 and 2693 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200
  • Has a 0.36 inch larger screen size

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 and Vivo X200 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
42.5
(Average)
Value Index
56.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Vivo X300
vs
Vivo X200

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2640 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 460 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Reinforced Glass Schott Xensation Alpha
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 360 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Vivo X200
6.67β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
Vivo X300
6.31β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Vivo X300 +70%
2685 nits
Vivo X200
1577 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 150.57 mm (5.93 inches) 160.27 mm (6.31 inches)
Width 71.92 mm (2.83 inches) 74.81 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 7.95 mm (0.31 inches) 7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 190 g (6.7 oz) 197 g (6.95 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Red, Pink, Purple White, Black, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 180 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X300 +1%
90.3%
Vivo X200
89.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 and Vivo X200
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Max clock 4210 MHz 3620 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra		 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Immortalis-G925 MC12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 and Vivo X200
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X300 +19%
3204
Vivo X200
2693
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X300 +13%
9874
Vivo X200
8706
Compute Score (GPU)
Vivo X300 +6%
25501
Vivo X200
23954
Compute Score (GPU) 25501 23954
Single-core score 3204 2693
Multi-core score 9874 8706
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X300 +22%
3330801
Vivo X200
2727422
CPU 981387 849678
GPU 1256247 932204
Memory 364630 352736
UX 728537 592804
Total score 3330801 2727422
Samples [25 tests] [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo X300 +32%
3119
Vivo X200
2369
Stability 57% 64%
Graphics test 23 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 3119 2369
3DMark Solar Bay
Vivo X300 +23%
12817
Vivo X200
10403
Graphics test 49 FPS 40 FPS
Section 1 56 FPS 43 FPS
Section 2 48 FPS 40 FPS
Section 3 42 FPS 35 FPS
Graphics score 12817 10403
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X300 +6%
15165
Vivo X200
14338
Web score 14375 13478
Video editing 5995 5647
Photo editing 34571 28707
Data manipulation 12159 11877
Writing score 22695 23394
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (49th and 122nd place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Asura)CPU Throttle63%
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (vakiho)AnTuTu3455310
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 -> AsuraAnTuTu3524597
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (burmalda)AnTuTu3363428
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (nimuruta)AnTuTu3651353
Add View all (31)
Vivo X200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (AKZ4R)AnTuTu2759839
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-27 (Losty)AnTuTu2661708
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-01 (Nguyeen)AnTuTu2844416
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-08 (Mahi)AnTuTu2628512
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-04 (Palazz9rt_ hype)AnTuTu2653518
Add View all (7)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM OriginOS 6 Funtouch OS 16
OS updates 5 years 3 years
Security updates - 3 years

Battery

Capacity 6040 mAh 5800 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (67% in 30 min) Yes (78% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 0:39 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:36 hr 10:06 hr
Watching video 20:41 hr 15:50 hr
Gaming 07:52 hr 07:21 hr
Standby 107 hr 88 hr
General battery life
Vivo X300 +24%
28:23 hr
Vivo X200
22:51 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12288 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 119Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.68 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.6
Focal length 70 mm 70 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-602 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 25 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung KD1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/3.42" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
Vivo X300
92.2 dB
Vivo X200
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 October 2024
Release date October 2025 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $799 $549
Successor - - Vivo X300
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X300 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
84 (85.7%)
14 (14.3%)
Total votes: 98

Related comparisons

1. Vivo X300 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro
2. Vivo X300 vs Vivo X300 Pro (3)
3. Vivo X300 vs Vivo X200 FE
4. Vivo X300 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5. Vivo X300 vs Realme GT 7 Pro
6. Vivo X300 vs Vivo X200 Pro
7. Vivo X300 vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro
8. Vivo X300 vs OnePlus 13
9. Vivo X200 vs Oppo Find X8 (9)
10. Vivo X200 vs Xiaomi 15
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский