Home > Smartphone comparison > Vivo X300s vs Pura 90 Pro – which one to choose?

Vivo X300s vs Huawei Pura 90 Pro

90 out of 100
Vivo X300s
VS
79 out of 100
Huawei Pura 90 Pro
Vivo X300s
Huawei Pura 90 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X300s (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Huawei Pura 90 Pro, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9030S and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300s
  • 3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3703K versus 1247K)
  • Comes with 1100 mAh larger battery capacity: 7100 vs 6000 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 66W)
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Dimensity 9500
  • 2.7x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3390 and 1235 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Pura 90 Pro
  • The rear camera has a 4x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300s and Huawei Pura 90 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
54.1
(Average)
Value Index
47.0
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Vivo X300s
vs
Pura 90 Pro

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.6 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1256 x 2760 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.82:9
PPI 452 ppi 459 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Reinforced Glass Kunlun Glass 2
Screen-to-body ratio 91.8% 90.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 162 mm (6.38 inches) 157 mm (6.18 inches)
Width 75.5 mm (2.97 inches) 74.5 mm (2.93 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.2 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 217 g (7.65 oz) 213.5 g (7.53 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Green, Purple White, Black, Pink, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X300s +2%
91.8%
Pura 90 Pro
90.4%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300s and Huawei Pura 90 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 HiSilicon Kirin 9030S
Max clock 4210 MHz 2700 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra		 - 4 cores at 1.62 GHz: Taishan v124 Little
- 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: Taishan v124 Mid
- 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Taishan v124 Big
L3 cache 16 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 5 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Da Vinci
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Maleoon 935F
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1716 MHz 933 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~1433.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300s and Huawei Pura 90 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X300s +174%
3390
Pura 90 Pro
1235
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X300s +171%
10059
Pura 90 Pro
3717
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 4287
Single-core score 3390 1235
Multi-core score 10059 3717
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X300s +197%
3703823
Pura 90 Pro
1247061
CPU 987627 293230
GPU 1399169 476557
Memory 541165 222374
UX 775859 254900
Total score 3703823 1247061
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
Submit your benchmark results

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 HarmonyOS 6.1
ROM OriginOS 6 -
OS updates 5 years -
Security updates 5 years -

Battery

Capacity 7100 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 66 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes Yes (50% in 25 min)
Full charging time - 0:59 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12288 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 4x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12.5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.4 - 4.0
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB Omnivision LightHunter 950L
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron -
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.1
Focal length 70 mm 91 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-602 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12.5 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 13 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4160 x 3120
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.1
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced March 2026 April 2026
Release date April 2026 May 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $805
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger - Yes, 66 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X300s is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Related comparisons

1. Huawei Pura 90 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 (Snapdragon)
2. Huawei Pura 90 Pro vs Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max
3. Huawei Pura 90 Pro vs OnePlus 15
4. Huawei Pura 90 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
5. Huawei Pura 90 Pro vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro
6. Vivo X300s vs Oppo Find X9
7. Vivo X300s vs Vivo X300
8. Vivo X300s vs Xiaomi 17 Pro
9. Vivo X300s vs Samsung Galaxy S26 (Snapdragon)
10. Vivo X300s vs Vivo X200s
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский