Home > Smartphone comparison > Vivo X300s vs Find X9 – which one to choose?

Vivo X300s vs Oppo Find X9

90 out of 100
Vivo X300s
VS
89 out of 100
Oppo Find X9
Vivo X300s
Oppo Find X9

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X300s (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Oppo Find X9, which is powered by the same chip and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300s
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
  • The phone is 6 months newer
  • 9% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3390 and 3107 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300s and Oppo Find X9 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
54.1
(Average)
Value Index
59.7
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Vivo X300s
vs
Find X9

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.59 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1256 x 2760 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 452 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 3600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Reinforced Glass Corning Gorilla Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.8% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 98.9%
PWM - 474 Hz
Response time - 20 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Vivo X300s
6.82β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 17.4 in2
Find X9
6.59β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 16.3 in2
~7% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Vivo X300s
n/a
Find X9
1118 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162 mm (6.38 inches) 156.98 mm (6.18 inches)
Width 75.5 mm (2.97 inches) 73.93 mm (2.91 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 217 g (7.65 oz) 203 g (7.16 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Green, Purple White, Black, Gray, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.71/5)
Drop resistance - Average (D) Β· 45 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X300s +2%
91.8%
Find X9
90.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300s and Oppo Find X9
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
Max clock 4210 MHz 4210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra		 - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 MediaTek NPU 990
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1716 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300s and Oppo Find X9
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X300s +9%
3390
Find X9
3107
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X300s +5%
10059
Find X9
9557
Compute Score (GPU)
Vivo X300s
n/a
Find X9
28255
Compute Score (GPU) - 28255
Single-core score 3390 3107
Multi-core score 10059 9557
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X300s +9%
3703823
Find X9
3400423
CPU 987627 966933
GPU 1399169 1291009
Memory 541165 423697
UX 775859 718784
Total score 3703823 3400423
Samples Less than 3 [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo X300s
n/a
Find X9
3119
Stability - 52%
Graphics test - 23 FPS
Graphics score - 3119
3DMark Solar Bay
Vivo X300s
n/a
Find X9
12571
Graphics test - 48 FPS
Section 1 - 55 FPS
Section 2 - 48 FPS
Section 3 - 41 FPS
Graphics score - 12571
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X300s
n/a
Find X9
13143
Web score - 11502
Video editing - 5863
Photo editing - 23536
Data manipulation - 12903
Writing score - 19110
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (39th and 51st place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300s
No benchmark results yet
Add
Oppo Find X9
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Azad Boyka)AnTuTu 113406583
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Dazza29)Geekbench 6 GPU24276
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Dazza29)Geekbench 6 CPU1953 / 3134
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (No name)AnTuTu 113272691
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-28 (Aditya)Geekbench 6 CPU3107 / 9557
Add View all (10)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 ColorOS 16
OS size - 14 GB
OS updates 5 years 5 years
Security updates 5 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 7100 mAh 7025 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes Yes (54% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 1:15 hr
Battery cycles - 1300 cycles
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12288 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 480 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 120Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.65
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB Sony LYT-808
Sensor size 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch) 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.6
Focal length 70 mm 73 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-602 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.5 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.74" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
Vivo X300s
n/a
Find X9
82.3 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced March 2026 October 2025
Release date April 2026 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $899
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger - Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the connectivity is more important to you, then choose the Vivo X300s. But if the sound is more of a priority – go for the Oppo Find X9.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
5 (55.6%)
4 (44.4%)
Total votes: 9

Related comparisons

1. Oppo Find X9 vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
2. Oppo Find X9 vs Oppo Find X8
3. Oppo Find X9 vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro
4. Oppo Find X9 vs Oppo Find X8s
5. Oppo Find X9 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
6. Vivo X300s vs Vivo X200s
7. Vivo X300s vs Samsung Galaxy S26 (Snapdragon)
8. Vivo X300s vs Vivo X300
9. Vivo X300s vs Xiaomi 17 Pro
10. Vivo X300s vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский