Vivo X500 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

90 out of 100
Vivo X500
VS
81 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.59-inch Vivo X500 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9600M) that was released on September 21, 2026, against the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 year and 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X500
  • Comes with 3600 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 3900 mAh
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Higher display refresh rate โ€“ 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 25W)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 30% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3930K versus 3034K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
  • 13% higher pixel density (513 vs 452 PPI)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Weighs 54 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X500 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
๐Ÿ“ฑ Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your countryโ€™s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
46.9
(Average)
Value Index
32.6
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2750 pixels 1440 x 3120 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 452 ppi 513 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1400 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4000 nits 2600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate - 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2
Screen-to-body ratio 91.1% 91.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Peak brightness test (auto)
n/a
1414 nits

Design and build

Height 157.01 mm (6.18 inches) 159 mm (6.26 inches)
Width 74.49 mm (2.93 inches) 76 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 8.15 mm (0.32 inches) 5.9 mm (0.23 inches)
Weight 217 g (7.65 oz) 163 g (5.75 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Gray, Pink Black, Silver, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.16/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) ยท 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X500 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9600M Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4210 MHz 4470 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X500 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X500 +25%
3314
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X500 +8%
10400
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 24111
Single-core score 3314 2650
Multi-core score 10400 9605
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X500 +30%
3930719
3034849
CPU 1004925 953422
GPU 1316839 1106386
Memory 477842 366238
UX 731113 608803
Total score 3930719 3034849
Samples Less than 3 [4 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 47%
Graphics test - 17 FPS
Graphics score - 2300
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 39 FPS
Section 1 - 49 FPS
Section 2 - 37 FPS
Section 3 - 31 FPS
Graphics score - 10302
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test - 33 FPS
Graphics score - 5539
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 21611
Video editing - 8617
Photo editing - 33511
Data manipulation - 17944
Writing score - 27324
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (26th and 99th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X500
No benchmark results yet
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-02 (ilushon)AnTuTu 112704730
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-01 -> NordisAnTuTu 112894477
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-12-25 (Ferg๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น)AnTuTu 113034849
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-09-30 (Reiiii)AnTuTu 113091117
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-05-17 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 GPU24111

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 17 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM OriginOS 7 One UI 8.0
OS size - 31.4 GB
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Security updates 7 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 3900 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 25 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (59% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 1:04 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 06:41 hr
Watching video - 15:11 hr
Gaming - 04:54 hr
Standby - 107 hr
General battery life
n/a
21:18 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16320 x 12240
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119ยฐ 120ยฐ
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 64 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.7
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-828 Samsung ISOCELL HP2
Sensor size 1/1.28" (โ‰ˆ 0.78 inch) 1/1.3" (โ‰ˆ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 64 MP -
Aperture f/2.6 -
Focal length 72 mm -
Sensor Sony LYT-610 -
Sensor size 1/2.0" (โ‰ˆ 0.5 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 13 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX564
Sensor size 1/2.76" (โ‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.55" (โ‰ˆ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.4 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4000 x 3000
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 20 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5K3LU
Sensor size 1/2.76" (โ‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/3.2" (โ‰ˆ 0.31 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2026 May 2025
Release date September 2026 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $1099
SAR (head) - 1.24 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.25 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X500 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!