Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs Vivo X500

92 out of 100
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
VS
90 out of 100
Vivo X500

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Vivo X500, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9600M and came out 1 year after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Has a 0.31 inch larger screen size
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 12% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3697 and 3314 points
Reasons to consider the Vivo X500
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Vivo X500 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 512 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
14.6
(Bad)
Value Index
46.9
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.59 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1260 x 2750 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 416 ppi 452 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1200 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 4000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Dragon Crystal Glass 3 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4% 91.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 103% -
PWM 122 Hz -
Response time 63 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
17 Pro Max
6.9″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 18.1 in2
Vivo X500
6.59″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 16.5 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1026 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) 157.01 mm (6.18 inches)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) 74.49 mm (2.93 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.15 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 217 g (7.65 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Purple White, Black, Gray, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
92.4%
91.1%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Vivo X500
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
Max clock 4610 MHz 4210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
L3 cache 12 MB 16 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 990
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1716 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Vivo X500
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
17 Pro Max +12%
3697
3314
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11010
10400
Compute Score (GPU)
27311
n/a
Compute Score (GPU) 27311 -
Single-core score 3697 3314
Multi-core score 11010 10400
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3998145
3930719
CPU 1196188 1004925
GPU 1435952 1316839
Memory 526360 477842
UX 839645 731113
Total score 3998145 3930719
Samples [4 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 75% -
Graphics test 18 FPS -
Graphics score 2410 -
3DMark Solar Bay
10958
n/a
Graphics test 42 FPS -
Section 1 48 FPS -
Section 2 41 FPS -
Section 3 34 FPS -
Graphics score 10958 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Graphics score 5808 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
19616
n/a
Web score 17696 -
Video editing 8079 -
Photo editing 41496 -
Data manipulation 18359 -
Writing score 25803 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (20th and 26th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-09 -> PocoF5hyperosAnTuTu 113241083
📘 2026-06-03 (Eterion)AnTuTu 114008895
📘 2025-12-27 (Chan)AnTuTu 113852243
📘 2025-11-02 (Okekdjekei)AnTuTu 113998145
Vivo X500
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 512 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 17
ROM HyperOS 3 OriginOS 7
OS size 32 GB -
OS updates 6 years 5 years
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 7500 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (82% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:48 hr -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 16:28 hr -
Watching video 25:18 hr -
Gaming 09:04 hr -
Standby 143 hr -
General battery life
36:26 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 102° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 64 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.7
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Omnivision Light Fusion 950L Sony LYT-828
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 64 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.6
Focal length 115 mm 72 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN8 Sony LYT-610
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 17 mm 15 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50M40 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 160 -
Zoom 137 -
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 20 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50M40 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
85.8 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2025 September 2026
Release date September 2025 September 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $999
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 90 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, battery life, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max. But if the display and connectivity are more of a priority – go for the Vivo X500.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!