Vivo Y300 GT vs iQOO Z10 Turbo

72 out of 100
Vivo Y300 GT
VS
75 out of 100
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo Y300 GT (with MediaTek Dimensity 8400) that was released on May 9, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, which is powered by the same chip. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1

Review

Evaluation of Vivo Y300 GT and iQOO Z10 Turbo crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
๐Ÿ“ฑ Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your countryโ€™s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
77.3
(Good)
Value Index
126.1
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 453 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness - 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5500 nits 4400 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.3% 89.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 163.72 mm (6.45 inches) 163.72 mm (6.45 inches)
Width 75.88 mm (2.99 inches) 75.88 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 8.09 mm (0.32 inches) 8.09 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 212 g (7.48 oz) 212 g (7.48 oz)
Waterproof IP65 IP65
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black, Gold White, Black, Gold, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
89.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo Y300 GT and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8400 MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Max clock 3250 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 MediaTek NPU 880
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MP7 Mali-G720 MP7
GPU shading units 896 896
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo Y300 GT and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
6419
6503
Compute Score (GPU)
Y300 GT +11%
11498
Compute Score (GPU) 11498 10325
Single-core score 1647 1639
Multi-core score 6419 6503
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Y300 GT +1%
2067824
2052566
CPU 639460 631243
GPU 589249 652532
Memory 351115 298321
UX 488000 470470
Total score 2067824 2052566
Samples Less than 3 [13 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 85%
Graphics test - 11 FPS
Graphics score - 1434
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 24 FPS
Section 1 - 26 FPS
Section 2 - 25 FPS
Section 3 - 21 FPS
Graphics score - 6345
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 10089
Video editing - 5542
Photo editing - 19943
Data manipulation - 7493
Writing score - 11652

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo Y300 GT
No benchmark results yet
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-26 (Mแบกnh)AnTuTu 112007569
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Niel)AnTuTu 112097730
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-08 (hazben)AnTuTu 112041814
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-27 (chouaib)AnTuTu 112102824
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-29 (ZYSX)AnTuTu 112021886

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM OriginOS 5 OriginOS 5

Battery

Capacity 7620 mAh 7620 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 23 min) Yes (50% in 23 min)
Full charging time 0:57 hr 0:56 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.95" (โ‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (โ‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.5
Sensor Sony IMX480 Sony IMX480
Sensor size 1/3.09" (โ‰ˆ 0.32 inch) 1/3.09" (โ‰ˆ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced May 2025 April 2025
Release date May 2025 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $280 $240
Successor - - Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 90 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo. It has a better camera, gaming, and connectivity.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (5.3%)
18 (94.7%)
Total votes: 19

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!