Xiaomi 14 vs Honor 200 Pro
77
out of 100
VS
72
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.36-inch Xiaomi 14 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on October 26, 2023, against the Honor 200 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and came out 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 14
- Shows 22% longer battery life (25:30 vs 20:51 hours)
- 39% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2363K versus 1698K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- The rear camera has a 3.2x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 21% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2206 and 1820 points
Reasons to consider the Honor 200 Pro
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Has a 0.42 inch larger screen size
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- The phone is 7 months newer
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.36 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2670 pixels | 1224 x 2700 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.85:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 437 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (10-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1000 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3000 nits | 4000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 90.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.6% | 99.8% |
| PWM | 429 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 2 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
200 Pro
6.78″ (19.85:9 ratio) = 17.3 in2
Xiaomi 14
6.36″ (20:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~14% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 152.8 mm (6.02 inches) | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 71.5 mm (2.81 inches) | 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Green, Pink | White, Black, Blue, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3300 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 735 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 903-1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15039 | 8821 |
| Single-core score | 2206 | 1820 |
| Multi-core score | 6701 | 4579 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 735611 | 516831 |
| GPU | 746981 | 495795 |
| Memory | 344459 | 270542 |
| UX | 536675 | 414892 |
| Total score | 2363726 | 1698060 |
| Samples | [27 tests] | [16 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 83% | 60% |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1511 | 998 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | 80% | - |
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | 17 FPS |
| Section 1 | 32 FPS | 19 FPS |
| Section 2 | 29 FPS | 17 FPS |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | 14 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7582 | 4494 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 87% | - |
| Graphics test | 27 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 4551 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15681 | 15496 |
| Video editing | 7814 | 7821 |
| Photo editing | 31599 | 29476 |
| Data manipulation | 14650 | 12021 |
| Writing score | 17307 | 16099 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#181st place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 14
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-25 (gertjan28) | Geekbench 7 GPU | 9730 |
| 📘 2026-09-25 (gertjan28) | Geekbench 7 CPU | 1824 / 6030 |
| 📘 2026-09-25 (gertjan28) | AnTuTu 12 | 2519660 |
| 📘 2026-09-25 (gertjan28) | AnTuTu 11 | 2286235 |
| 📘 2026-09-24 (neko_rhythm) | AnTuTu 11 | 2406819 |
Honor 200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-08 (ChenTH) | AnTuTu 11 | 1573533 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Dimik) | AnTuTu 11 | 1768071 |
| 📘 2026-05-26 (Jason) | AnTuTu 11 | 1633389 |
| 📘 2026-04-25 (Олег) | AnTuTu 11 | 1801694 |
| 📘 2026-03-29 (Fenrir) | AnTuTu 11 | 1421683 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 28 GB | 55 GB |
| OS updates | 4 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4610 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (66 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (58% in 15 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:35 hr | 0:45 hr |
| Web browsing | 10:59 hr | 10:55 hr |
| Watching video | 17:04 hr | 08:13 hr |
| Gaming | 05:15 hr | 05:51 hr |
| Standby | 111 hr | 99 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.2x | Optical, 2.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 1920 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 115° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | - |
| Sensor | OmniVision OVX9000 Light Fusion 900 | OmniVision OV50H |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) | 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.2 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 75 mm | 68 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX856 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 55 | 70 |
| Preview | 73 | 69 |
| Zoom | 134 | 132 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi 14 from DxOMark | Photo samples of Honor 200 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32B | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3" (≈ 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes, DP 1.2 | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | - | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2023 | May 2024 |
| Release date | November 2023 | May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $699 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi 17 | - Honor 500 Pro |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi 14. It has a better performance, gaming, battery life, connectivity, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 193
Related comparisons
2.
Xiaomi 14 vs Xiaomi 14 Pro (1)
6.
Honor 200 Pro vs Honor 200 (2)