Xiaomi 15T Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
86
out of 100
VS
75
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi 15T Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on September 24, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, which is powered by Exynos 2400 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 15T Pro
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Shows 13% longer battery life (27:31 vs 24:20 hours)
- The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 45W)
- 34% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2788K versus 2087K)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Delivers 13% higher peak brightness (1409 against 1243 nits)
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 16% higher pixel density (447 vs 385 PPI)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
- Weighs 20 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Size | 6.83 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2772 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 447 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | - | 1300 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | 1900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Gorilla Glass Victus Plus |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 89.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.7 mm (6.41 inches) | 161.3 mm (6.35 inches) |
| Width | 77.9 mm (3.07 inches) | 76.6 mm (3.02 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.96 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | - | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Gold, Gray | White, Black, Gray, Blue, Yellow |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.63/5) | Good (3.19/5) |
| Drop resistance | Excellent (A) · 270 drops | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
| Max clock | 3630 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Xclipse 940 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~3406.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 23010 | 18209 |
| Single-core score | 2529 | 2126 |
| Multi-core score | 7899 | 6910 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 785620 | 714011 |
| GPU | 1057591 | 653511 |
| Memory | 385760 | 303868 |
| UX | 559468 | 416496 |
| Total score | 2788439 | 2087886 |
| Samples | [50 tests] | [48 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 77% | 62% |
| Graphics test | 17 FPS | 14 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2268 | 1840 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 37 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 1 | 42 FPS | 37 FPS |
| Section 2 | 38 FPS | 31 FPS |
| Section 3 | 32 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Graphics score | 9752 | 8302 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17483 | 12949 |
| Video editing | 6965 | 8051 |
| Photo editing | 30630 | 34315 |
| Data manipulation | 15940 | 13202 |
| Writing score | 20434 | 23460 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#129th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 15T Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-16 -> la.mih0 | AnTuTu 12 | 2649888 |
| 📘 2026-09-16 -> kannzera | AnTuTu 11 | 2643488 |
| 📘 2026-09-15 (k) | AnTuTu 11 | 2643488 |
| 📘 2026-09-09 -> cyberQbit | AnTuTu 12 | 2600160 |
| 📘 2026-08-25 -> KerimTheBabo31 | AnTuTu 11 | 2759001 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-25 (Omar_syriangamerr) | AnTuTu 12 | 2245977 |
| 📘 2026-09-12 -> Viljami22 | AnTuTu 12 | 2321618 |
| 📘 2026-09-11 -> S25fe6833 | AnTuTu 12 | 2388378 |
| 📘 2026-08-17 (Neto) | AnTuTu 11 | 2303141 |
| 📘 2026-08-09 -> JamesPatrick | AnTuTu 11 | 2027080 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3.0 | One UI 8.0 |
| OS size | - | 23.8 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 7 years |
| Security updates | - | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5500 mAh | 4900 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (87% in 30 min) | Yes (52% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:36 hr | 1:10 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1600 cycles | 2000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 12:09 hr | 13:29 hr |
| Watching video | 19:35 hr | 14:24 hr |
| Gaming | 07:04 hr | 06:03 hr |
| Standby | 108 hr | 87 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#98th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8160 x 6120 |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 123° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 8 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OVX9100 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) | 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.2 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 115 mm | 75 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | OmniVision OV08A10 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5K3L6 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) | 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 160 | 150 |
| Zoom | 127 | 83 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi 15T Pro from DxOMark | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) | 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | September 2025 | September 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $649 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 15T Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 213