Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs Realme GT 7 Pro

92 out of 100
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
VS
84 out of 100
Realme GT 7 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Realme GT 7 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 6500 mAh
  • Shows 13% longer battery life (36:26 vs 32:07 hours)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • 28% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3998K versus 3125K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • The phone is 11 months newer
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Reasons to consider the Realme GT 7 Pro
  • Delivers 127% higher peak brightness (2317 against 1021 nits)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Realme GT 7 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 512 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
14.6
(Bad)
Value Index
80.4
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1264 x 2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 416 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1200 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 6500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Dragon Crystal Glass 3 Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4% 88.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 103% 99.8%
PWM 122 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 63 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1021 nits
GT 7 Pro +127%
2317 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) 162.5 mm (6.4 inches)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) 76.9 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.6 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 222.8 g (7.86 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Purple White, Gray, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.59/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) · 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
92.4%
88.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Realme GT 7 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4610 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Realme GT 7 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
17 Pro Max +23%
3697
2995
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17 Pro Max +17%
11010
9380
Compute Score (GPU)
17 Pro Max +13%
27311
24257
Compute Score (GPU) 27311 24257
Single-core score 3697 2995
Multi-core score 11010 9380
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
17 Pro Max +28%
3998145
3125854
CPU 1196188 893166
GPU 1435952 1098769
Memory 526360 443515
UX 839645 690404
Total score 3998145 3125854
Samples [4 tests] [12 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2410
n/a
Stability 75% -
Graphics test 18 FPS -
Graphics score 2410 -
3DMark Solar Bay
10958
n/a
Graphics test 42 FPS -
Section 1 48 FPS -
Section 2 41 FPS -
Section 3 34 FPS -
Graphics score 10958 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
5808
n/a
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Graphics score 5808 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
19616
n/a
Web score 17696 -
Video editing 8079 -
Photo editing 41496 -
Data manipulation 18359 -
Writing score 25803 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (27th and 89th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-09 -> PocoF5hyperosAnTuTu 113241083
📘 2026-06-03 (Eterion)AnTuTu 114008895
📘 2025-12-27 (Chan)AnTuTu 113852243
📘 2025-11-02 (Okekdjekei)AnTuTu 113998145
Realme GT 7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-16 (Awiewizz)AnTuTu 113125854
📘 2026-05-26 (tei0q)AnTuTu 113315538
📘 2026-05-11 (Neang1201)AnTuTu 113360878
📘 2026-04-23 (Vladisss)AnTuTu 113111924
📘 2026-02-02 (Santiijago)AnTuTu 113300025

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 512 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM HyperOS 3 Realme UI 6.0
OS size 32 GB 58 GB
OS updates 6 years 3 years
Security updates 6 years 4 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (82% in 30 min) Yes (58% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 0:35 hr
Battery cycles - 800 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 16:28 hr 16:09 hr
Watching video 25:18 hr 18:28 hr
Gaming 09:04 hr 07:48 hr
Standby 143 hr 132 hr
General battery life
17 Pro Max +13%
36:26 hr
32:07 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 24FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 102° 112°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision Light Fusion 950L Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.7
Focal length 115 mm 73 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN8 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 17 mm 16 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50M40 Sony IMX355
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1.14 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 160 -
Zoom 137 -
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4608 x 3456
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.5
Focal length 21 mm 24 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50M40 Sony IMX480
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/3.09" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
85.8 dB
GT 7 Pro +5%
89.9 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2025 November 2024
Release date September 2025 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $800
Successor - - Realme GT 8 Pro
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 120 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
37 (71.2%)
15 (28.8%)
Total votes: 52

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!