Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max, which is powered by Apple A19 Pro and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • Comes with 2412 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 5088 mAh
  • 54% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3998K versus 2590K)
  • Shows 10% longer battery life (36:26 vs 33:14 hours)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 40W)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • 11% higher pixel density (460 vs 416 PPI)
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 512 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
14.6
(Bad)
Value Index
39.5
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1320 x 2868 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 416 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1200 nits 3000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Dragon Crystal Glass 3 Ceramic Shield 2
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4% 91.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 103% 99.9%
PWM 122 Hz 240 Hz
Response time 63 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1032 nits
1009 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) 163.4 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) 78 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.75 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 233 g (8.22 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Purple Silver, Blue, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display No
Repairability - Good (3.04/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) · 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
92.4%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Apple A19 Pro
Max clock 4610 MHz 4260 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz:
- 2 cores at 4.26 GHz:
L3 cache 12 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Apple Neural Engine
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 6 core Apple GPU
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1620 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~2488.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11010
Compute Score (GPU)
27311
46450
Compute Score (GPU) 27311 46450
Single-core score 3697 3940
Multi-core score 11010 10434
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
17 Pro Max +54%
3998145
CPU 1196188 788283
GPU 1435952 922741
Memory 526360 226010
UX 839645 653533
Total score 3998145 2590567
Samples [4 tests] [14 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 75% 76%
Graphics test 18 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 2410 2487
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 42 FPS 42 FPS
Section 1 48 FPS 47 FPS
Section 2 41 FPS 42 FPS
Section 3 34 FPS 36 FPS
Graphics score 10958 10999
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Graphics score 5808 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 17696 -
Video editing 8079 -
Photo editing 41496 -
Data manipulation 18359 -
Writing score 25803 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-09 -> PocoF5hyperosAnTuTu 113241083
📘 2026-06-03 (Eterion)AnTuTu 114008895
📘 2025-12-27 (Chan)AnTuTu 113852243
📘 2025-11-02 (Okekdjekei)AnTuTu 113998145
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-21 (Md.Imran Shafiq)AnTuTu 112602137
📘 2026-07-31 (xon1005)Geekbench 6 CPU4028 / 10579
📘 2026-06-15 (Domi)AnTuTu 112427596
📘 2026-06-09 (Cristiano)AnTuTu 112258714
📘 2026-05-29 (Joker)AnTuTu 112433128

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 512 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 NVMe
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 iOS 26 (Can be upgraded to iOS 26.5)
ROM HyperOS 3 -
OS size 32 GB 20 GB
OS updates 6 years 7 years
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 5088 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 40 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (25 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (82% in 30 min) Yes (65% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 1:12 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 16:28 hr 12:36 hr
Watching video 25:18 hr 22:25 hr
Gaming 09:04 hr 08:17 hr
Standby 143 hr 154 hr
General battery life
17 Pro Max +10%
36:26 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8064 x 6048
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 4x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 102° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
4) Depth
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.78
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision Light Fusion 950L Sony IMX903
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.8
Focal length 115 mm 100 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN8 Sony IMX973
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 17 mm 13 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50M40 Sony IMX972
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 160 -
Zoom 137 -
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 17 Pro Max from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 18 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4896 x 3672
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.9
Focal length 21 mm 20 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50M40 Sony IMX914
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) -
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Optical
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 -
Type of SIM card Nano eSIM
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
85.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2025 September 2025
Release date September 2025 September 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $1199
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Not included
Further details
Notes on iPhone 17 Pro Max:
    - Battery is 5,088 mAh on the eSIM-only model (vs 4,832 mAh on the Nano SIM + eSIM version).
    - The Chinese model alone includes dual Nano SIM slots and 15 W wireless charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the connectivity, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2558 (80.2%)
631 (19.8%)
Total votes: 3189

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Duts June 23, 2026 at 01:27 PM
Why chinese companies cannot live without copy iPhones
0 Reply
Avatar
Apple is shit May 11, 2026 at 05:16 AM
In real live xiaomi 17 pro max ist better than iphone 17 pro max.
+3 Reply
Avatar
ooo November 18, 2025 at 03:41 PM
xiaomi fanboys loves shitty OS with stupid adverts.
+9 Reply
GoonLord November 23, 2025 at 04:15 PM
Lowk facts tho shi is hell to use
+2 Reply
Avatar
wamada wee December 4, 2025 at 04:04 PM
apple fanboys loves shitty specs with stupid adverts.
+21 Reply
Avatar
Don't say ..... January 6, 2026 at 04:02 PM
wamada wee, Hi Mr wamada wee don't say so much shit it's not good for you Apples amazing you can't have the dreams of having such a thing
0 Reply
Avatar
smsm March 1, 2026 at 12:32 PM
delusional apple fanboys hates value for money LOL. not surprised
+7 Reply
Avatar
hhaha March 2, 2026 at 01:26 PM
smsm, agreed. android more superior in everything
+3 Reply
Avatar
Jabed Kamal October 31, 2025 at 03:54 AM
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max stands out as a device that demonstrates Xiaomi's commitment to innovation, presenting a compelling blend of robust performance, thoughtful design, and a user experience that truly elevates the smartphone category. The meticulous engineering and aesthetically pleasing design choices come together to create a device that is both functional and satisfying to use.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Samsung Trash November 2, 2025 at 09:53 AM
Bro ngl, but the software is not really innovative lol. (copied iOS)
+7 Reply
Avatar
Omar October 23, 2025 at 02:23 AM
Apple claims to cancel the SIM port and rely on eSIM due to exploitation of the increased battery size. Well, why do Android devices design thinner devices with a battery size of up to 7000 or 8300 mAh? Why doesn’t Apple rely on the thinner silicon and carbon battery type instead of the thicker lithium-ion battery type?
+4 Reply
Avatar
Leik October 28, 2025 at 03:54 PM
Is it significantly better than iPhone battery life a big no both got dame battery life see videos
0 Reply
GoonLord November 23, 2025 at 04:17 PM
I think they are waiting for the health test of those silicon battery types cause they are relatively new so we dont know if they retain good battery health over a long time
+1 Reply
Avatar
dora October 21, 2025 at 06:43 AM
xiaomi is the best, way better than iphone
+999 Reply
Avatar
King October 13, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Nanoreview's reviews are completely wrong and based on speculation, for example, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is the best mobile phone in the world in battery performance, but here it gives the score to the Xiaomi 17 which has a bigger battery!!! Nanoreview's reviews are unreliable and based on speculation.
+999 Reply
Avatar
Quenn October 18, 2025 at 10:37 PM
They havent tested xiaomi 17 pro max's battery yet since its hard to obtain, do your research next time before posting. Also are you blind cant you see the bigger battery and plus its silicon carbon, your just gonna say "oh well but iOS saves more battery" even though we dont even have the results yet!
+7 Reply
Avatar
fegwrebtgrf October 24, 2025 at 06:04 PM
apple sheep is coping. Yes, xiaomi is unoptimized but the 7500 mah battery makes up for it! xiaomi lasts longer then iPhone.
+6 Reply
Avatar
Zana October 11, 2025 at 03:13 AM
Xiaomi has 80% better performance and optical 5× camera and better screen (Higher screen acquisition ratio) And a screen from the back (so best selfie camera) Xiaomi is better in everything The comparison of the battery and charging speed is very clear.no need to talk about
+999 Reply
Singh Leet October 17, 2025 at 01:38 PM
80% in your dreams, the displays are comparable, screen is just only battery drain and is kind of useless, xiaomi 17 pro max is less innovative than 15 ultra this is my opinion.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Yywirless October 18, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Singh Leet, @Sing leat. if you have an opinion, at least dont be so stupid and spread misindormation
0 Reply
Singh Leet October 18, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Yywirless, after they updated the geekbench iphone wins for now 13% faster single core is better than 5% faster multi core on xiaomi
0 Reply
Avatar
Val October 5, 2025 at 09:25 AM
it got 3.7 millions which is normal for SD 8 elite gen 5 1 year old phones with SD 8 elite gen 4 scores more then iPhone 17 pro.
+17 Reply
Avatar
Samsung Trash October 14, 2025 at 11:01 AM
AnTuTu of iOS and Android aren't comparable, illiterate imbecile. 🤡🥀 Go check out AnTuTu's official statement about it. Metal API and Vulkan scores aren't comparable. AnTuTu was only built for Android's benchmarks, not iOS's. If you want to compare, you need to use Geekbench.
+999 Reply
Avatar
haha March 2, 2026 at 01:27 PM
Samsung Trash, even in geekbench multicore, sd 8e gen 5 stomps , and so is antutu. even geekbench single core is not enough
+4 Reply
Avatar
Tech October 4, 2025 at 09:32 AM
Bruh, Xiaomi better🤣🖕
+26 Reply
Avatar
Bud September 28, 2025 at 07:40 AM
Xiaomi was the definition of (Being cheaper while being better) at this rate iPhones are always behind of android 😂
+31 Reply
Serhii September 28, 2025 at 08:34 AM
My bad, thank you for a comment.
+12 Reply
Avatar
Cyber threat October 8, 2025 at 03:33 PM
😂😂😂in software, privacy and security android still has a long way
+10 Reply
Singh Leet September 27, 2025 at 06:52 PM
when will xiaomi ceo be called Lei Cook?😂 he will actually cook better than Tim LOL😂
+8 Reply
Avatar
Kin October 4, 2025 at 05:10 AM
Actually in China Lei is sometimes nameed Leibos(meaning that like steven jobs) . But Lei doesn't like being called that.
+4 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd September 27, 2025 at 01:59 PM
Xiaomi has superior hardware. However, I will wait for reviews on the software outside China.
+6 Reply
Avatar
EPSTEIN September 27, 2025 at 12:52 PM
finally the 32m on xiaomi is fixed, W
+5 Reply
Avatar
Mark September 27, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Chinese decided to just sell their own 17 series without the mark up which goes into Tims wallet
+3 Reply
Avatar
Diddy September 27, 2025 at 05:34 AM
HOW THE HELL XIAOMI GOT 32 MILLION IN ANTUTU!?!? 💀
+35 Reply
Avatar
Jah September 26, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Somebody definitely messed the Xiaomi antutu score up😂32 million is crazy.
+14 Reply