Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Vivo X500 Pro Max

93 out of 100
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
VS
95 out of 100
Vivo X500 Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi 17 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on December 25, 2025, against the Vivo X500 Pro Max, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro and came out 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 4.3x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X500 Pro Max
  • Comes with 2000 mAh larger battery capacity: 8000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 32% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4838K versus 3667K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • 22% higher pixel density (507 vs 416 PPI)
  • 12% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 4172 and 3711 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Vivo X500 Pro Max crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 512 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
29.9
(Mediocre)
Value Index
37.3
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.85 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.8:9
PPI 416 ppi 507 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1200 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 4400 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Xiaomi Shield Glass 3.0 Armor Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 121 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
3669 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) 163.32 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) 76.82 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.29 mm (0.33 inches) 7.95 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 218.4 g (7.7 oz) 225 g (7.94 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Purple White, Black, Silver, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.63/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
17 Ultra +2%
92.4%
90.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Vivo X500 Pro Max
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
Max clock 4610 MHz 4550 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 3 + 3)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 3 cores at 3.1 GHz: C2-Pro
- 3 cores at 4.35 GHz: C2-Pro
- 2 cores at 4.55 GHz: C2-Ultra
L3 cache 12 MB 16 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 2 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 1090
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1800 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~5529.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Vivo X500 Pro Max
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3711
4172
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11259
12688
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 27219 -
Single-core score 3711 4172
Multi-core score 11259 12688
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3667711
4838033
CPU 1064371 1388289
GPU 1296835 1881401
Memory 518366 488503
UX 788139 1079840
Total score 3667711 4838033
Samples [7 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 81% -
Graphics test 18 FPS -
Graphics score 2370 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 41 FPS -
Section 1 46 FPS -
Section 2 41 FPS -
Section 3 36 FPS -
Graphics score 10845 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 16855 -
Video editing 8052 -
Photo editing 40273 -
Data manipulation 15949 -
Writing score 26073 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (36th and 3rd place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-13 (H1roshi)AnTuTu 113530859
📘 2026-07-04 (...)AnTuTu 113582442
📘 2026-06-26 (ALBAY)AnTuTu 113913603
📘 2026-04-18 (UsusWarteg)AnTuTu 113828672
📘 2026-03-17 (KosmosTer)AnTuTu 113527804
Vivo X500 Pro Max
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 512 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 17
ROM HyperOS 3 OriginOS 7
OS size 36 GB -
OS updates 6 years 5 years
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 8000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (72% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:50 hr -
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 16:09 hr -
Watching video 22:41 hr -
Gaming 08:02 hr -
Standby 125 hr -
General battery life
33:23 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 4.3x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 240FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 115° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.67 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor OmniVision OVX10500 Sony LYT-910
Sensor size 1/1" (≈ 1 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.6 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.4 - 3.0 f/2.7
Focal length 100 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPE Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.56 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 14 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 175 -
Zoom 169 -
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 17 Ultra from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 20 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
84.7 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced December 2025 September 2026
Release date March 2026 September 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $1199 $1299
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 90 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, gaming, and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X500 Pro Max. But if the software, design, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi 17 Ultra.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2 (66.7%)
1 (33.3%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!