Xiaomi 17 vs Huawei Mate 70 Air
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.3-inch Xiaomi 17 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Huawei Mate 70 Air, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9020A and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17
- 2.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3404K versus 1504K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 66W)
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
- Better grip in hands – the body is 9.7 mm narrower
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Mate 70 Air
- Has a 0.7 inch larger screen size
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.3 inches | 7 inches |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2656 pixels | 1320 x 2760 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.9:9 |
| PPI | 464 ppi | 437 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3500 nits | 4000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Xiaomi Shield Glass | Huawei Kunlun Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 88.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 102.9% | - |
| PWM | 120 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
Mate 70 Air
7″ (19.9:9 ratio) = 18.4 in2
Xiaomi 17
6.3″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~21% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 151.1 mm (5.95 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) | 81.5 mm (3.21 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.06 mm (0.32 inches) | 6.6 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | - |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Green, Pink, Purple | White, Black, Silver, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
| Repairability | Average (2.63/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Excellent (A) · 270 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | HiSilicon Kirin 9020A |
| Max clock | 4610 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 4 cores at 1.6 GHz: Taishan-Little - 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: TaiShan V120 - 1 core at 2.5 GHz: TaiShan V121 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 10 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | SMIC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~1720.3 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27737 | 3730 |
| Single-core score | 3583 | 1212 |
| Multi-core score | 10772 | 3483 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 961758 | 537902 |
| GPU | 1232901 | 242916 |
| Memory | 517802 | 412154 |
| UX | 692155 | 311997 |
| Total score | 3404616 | 1504969 |
| Samples | [9 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 78% | - |
| Graphics test | 17 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2354 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 41 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 46 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 41 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 36 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 10821 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | 35 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 5976 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17608 | - |
| Video editing | 8079 | - |
| Photo editing | 37146 | - |
| Data manipulation | 15067 | - |
| Writing score | 25125 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#42nd place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 17
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-18 (Ivan) | AnTuTu | 3632260 |
| 📘 2026-08-16 (Wallt) | AnTuTu | 3277818 |
| 📘 2026-08-16 (Missed) | AnTuTu | 3722570 |
| 📘 2026-08-04 (Paul) | AnTuTu | 3220143 |
| 📘 2026-07-22 (Arsen) | AnTuTu | 3378411 |
Huawei Mate 70 Air
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | HarmonyOS 5.1 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | - |
| OS size | 35 GB | - |
| OS updates | 6 years | - |
| Security updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 6330 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (71% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:46 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 15:00 hr | - |
| Watching video | 24:44 hr | - |
| Gaming | 08:15 hr | - |
| Standby | 131 hr | - |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#19th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.6x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 1920 FPS (720p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 102° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 12 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision 950L LightHunter | 1/1.3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) | 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.2 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 60 mm | 69 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50M | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 10.7 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50M | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September 2025 | November 2025 |
| Release date | September 2025 | November 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $600 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Face recognition sensor - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 66 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 17 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1
Related comparisons
6.
Xiaomi 17 vs Apple iPhone 17 (1)
10.
Xiaomi 17 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro (2)