Home > Smartphone comparison > Vivo X300 vs Mate 70 Air – which one to choose?

Vivo X300 vs Huawei Mate 70 Air

89 out of 100
Vivo X300
VS
73 out of 100
Huawei Mate 70 Air
Vivo X300
Huawei Mate 70 Air

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X300 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Huawei Mate 70 Air, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9020A. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300
  • 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3330K versus 1504K)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 66W)
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Dimensity 9500
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 9.58 mm narrower
  • 2.6x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3204 and 1212 points
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • Weighs 18 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Mate 70 Air
  • Has a 0.69 inch larger screen size
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 and Huawei Mate 70 Air crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
42.5
(Average)
Value Index
14.1
(Bad)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Vivo X300
vs
Mate 70 Air

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.31 inches 7 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2640 pixels 1320 x 2760 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.9:9
PPI 460 ppi 437 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 4000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Reinforced Glass Huawei Kunlun Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 88.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 360 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Mate 70 Air
7″ (19.9:9 ratio) = 18.4 in2
Vivo X300
6.31″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~21% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Vivo X300
2685 nits
Mate 70 Air
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 150.57 mm (5.93 inches) 165 mm (6.5 inches)
Width 71.92 mm (2.83 inches) 81.5 mm (3.21 inches)
Thickness 7.95 mm (0.31 inches) 6.6 mm (0.26 inches)
Weight 190 g (6.7 oz) 208 g (7.34 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Red, Pink, Purple White, Black, Silver, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Repairability Good (3/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 180 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X300 +2%
90.3%
Mate 70 Air
88.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 and Huawei Mate 70 Air
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 HiSilicon Kirin 9020A
Max clock 4210 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra		 - 4 cores at 1.6 GHz: Taishan-Little
- 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: TaiShan V120
- 1 core at 2.5 GHz: TaiShan V121
L3 cache 16 MB 10 MB
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 7 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Da Vinci
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Maleoon 910
GPU shading units 1536 1024
GPU clock 1716 MHz 840 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~1720.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 and Huawei Mate 70 Air
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X300 +164%
3204
Mate 70 Air
1212
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X300 +183%
9874
Mate 70 Air
3483
Compute Score (GPU)
Vivo X300 +584%
25501
Mate 70 Air
3730
Compute Score (GPU) 25501 3730
Single-core score 3204 1212
Multi-core score 9874 3483
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X300 +121%
3330801
Mate 70 Air
1504969
CPU 981387 537902
GPU 1256247 242916
Memory 364630 412154
UX 728537 311997
Total score 3330801 1504969
Samples [25 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 57% -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
Graphics score 3119 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 49 FPS -
Section 1 56 FPS -
Section 2 48 FPS -
Section 3 42 FPS -
Graphics score 12817 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14375 -
Video editing 5995 -
Photo editing 34571 -
Data manipulation 12159 -
Writing score 22695 -
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-16 (Asura)CPU Throttle70%
📘 2026-09-07 (Asura)CPU Throttle63%
📘 2026-08-23 (vakiho)AnTuTu3455310
📘 2026-08-22 -> AsuraAnTuTu3524597
📘 2026-08-12 (burmalda)AnTuTu3363428
Add View all (32)
Huawei Mate 70 Air
No benchmark results yet
Add

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 HarmonyOS 5.1
ROM OriginOS 6 -
OS updates 5 years -

Battery

Capacity 6040 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 66 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (67% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:48 hr -
Battery cycles 1200 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:36 hr -
Watching video 20:41 hr -
Gaming 07:52 hr -
Standby 107 hr -
General battery life
Vivo X300
28:23 hr
Mate 70 Air
n/a
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12288 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 119° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 12 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.68 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB 1/1.3
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron -
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.4
Focal length 70 mm 69 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-602 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 10.7 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 20 mm 18 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
Vivo X300
92.2 dB
Mate 70 Air
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 November 2025
Release date October 2025 November 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $799 $600
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 66 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X300 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

Related comparisons

1. Huawei Mate 70 Air vs Apple iPhone Air
2. Huawei Mate 70 Air vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
3. Huawei Mate 70 Air vs Huawei Mate 80
4. Huawei Mate 70 Air vs Xiaomi 17
5. Huawei Mate 70 Air vs Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
6. Vivo X300 vs Vivo X300 Pro (3)
7. Vivo X300 vs Vivo X200 FE
8. Vivo X300 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
9. Vivo X300 vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro
10. Vivo X300 vs Vivo X200 Pro
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский