Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Samsung Galaxy A15 4G

Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.74-inch Xiaomi Redmi 13C (with MediaTek Helio G85) that was released on November 10, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G
  • 52% higher pixel density (396 vs 260 PPI)
  • 45% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (522K versus 361K)
  • Delivers 33% higher peak brightness (805 against 604 nits)
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Helio G99
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Super AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 72% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 708 and 412 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi 13C and Samsung Galaxy A15 4G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 64 GB
VS
4 / 128 GB
46.4
(Average)
Value Index
69.5
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD Super AMOLED
Size 6.74 inches 6.5 inches
Resolution 720 x 1600 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 260 ppi 396 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max rated brightness 600 nits 800 nits
HDR support No No
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.7% 84.4%
Display features - - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 94.5% 100%
PWM Not detected 187 Hz
Response time 37 ms 1 ms
Contrast 1536:1 ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
604 nits
805 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 168 mm (6.61 inches) 160.1 mm (6.3 inches)
Width 78 mm (3.07 inches) 76.8 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.09 mm (0.32 inches) 8.4 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 192 g (6.77 oz) 200 g (7.05 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue, Green Black, Blue, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio
83.7%
84.4%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi 13C and Samsung Galaxy A15 4G
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Helio G85 MediaTek Helio G99
Max clock 2000 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 12 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MC2
GPU shading units 48 64
GPU clock 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS ~96 GFLOPS ~128 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi 13C and Samsung Galaxy A15 4G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
412
708
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1134
1862
Compute Score (GPU)
571
Galaxy A15 4G +5637%
32758
Compute Score (GPU) 571 32758
Single-core score 412 708
Multi-core score 1134 1862
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
361045
522075
CPU 141937 203294
GPU 28251 42919
Memory 97993 120509
UX 92828 155353
Total score 361045 522075
Samples [6 tests] [18 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
130
Stability 94% -
Graphics test 1 FPS 1 FPS
Graphics score 80 130
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 1 FPS -
Graphics score 158 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Redmi 13C +1%
9141
Web score 9117 9148
Video editing 6380 4687
Photo editing 20262 14623
Data manipulation 6222 7719
Writing score 9556 11588

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-28 (whytezz)AnTuTu 11384012
📘 2026-08-07 (Jasur)AnTuTu 11345264
📘 2026-07-14 (Lucas)AnTuTu 11391217
📘 2026-07-12 (hasnel)AnTuTu 11394673
📘 2025-12-05 (Aflika)AnTuTu 11341743
Samsung Galaxy A15 4G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-23 (LEADER OF DAWN)Geekbench 7 CPU664 / 2074
📘 2026-08-31 (Muhammedali)AnTuTu 11503324
📘 2026-08-30 (Yusif)AnTuTu 11531994
📘 2026-07-24 (LEADER OF DAWN)Geekbench 6 CPU724 / 1991
📘 2026-07-06 (عين شمساوي)AnTuTu 11480715

Memory

RAM
RAM size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 1800 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 64 GB 128 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 2.0 One UI 8.5
OS size 23 GB 23 GB
OS updates - 2 years
Security updates - 3 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 18 W 25 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (28% in 30 min) Yes (47% in 30 min)
Full charging time 2:09 hr 1:21 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 09:31 hr 09:21 hr
Watching video 15:08 hr 15:42 hr
Gaming 04:55 hr 07:54 hr
Standby 143 hr 137 hr
General battery life
26:21 hr
26:31 hr
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (127th and 120th place)

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6144 8160 x 6120
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion - 120 FPS (720p)
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Macro: 2 MP
3) Depth: 0.08 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 5 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 28 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Hynix Hi5022Q
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution - 5 MP
Aperture - f/2.2
Focal length - 17 mm
Sensor - SmartSense SC501CS
Sensor size - 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Stabilization - Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP 2 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.4
Sensor - GalaxyCore GC02M1
Stabilization Digital No

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 4128 x 3096
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length - 26 mm
Sensor CMOS GalaxyCore GC013A
Sensor size - 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 7 13
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Mono Mono
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio Yes Yes
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
80.8 dB
83.8 dB

Other

Category Budget Budget
Announced November 2023 December 2023
Release date November 2023 December 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $140 $170
Successor - Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G - Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
51 (15%)
289 (85%)
Total votes: 340

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Mohammad May 7, 2024 at 12:57 PM
The Redmi 13C is much smoother and more attractive within the user interface, but it has nothing to say about the A15 in heavy tasks. The A15's performance is also much more stable and receives more updates. If you have doubts about buying these two phones, you must choose between the two user interfaces.
+36 Reply
Avatar
Luyanda March 14, 2024 at 03:45 PM
This phone is the best phone with smooth performance camera reviewing and the rate of the speed
+24 Reply
Avatar
Ayile fred February 23, 2024 at 04:43 AM
The Samsung Galaxy A15 is the best phone I've ever wanted to buy. Please continue to provide quality phones like this one.
+25 Reply