Xiaomi Redmi 9A vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.53-inch Xiaomi Redmi 9A (with MediaTek Helio G25) that was released on June 30, 2020, against the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 5 years and 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi 9A
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 256GB
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Weighs 20 grams less
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • 24.1x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3939K versus 163K)
  • Delivers 546% higher peak brightness (2790 against 432 nits)
  • Has 6x more RAM: 12GB versus 2GB
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • 86% higher pixel density (500 vs 269 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (60W versus 10W)
  • Modern USB Type-C port
  • Shows 20% longer battery life (28:50 vs 24:07 hours)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 25W
  • Thinner bezels – 10.3% more screen real estate
  • Optical image stabilization
  • Has a 0.37 inch larger screen size

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi 9A and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Should I update?
No 100% Yes
Yes, this is a clear and meaningful upgrade.
Updating from Xiaomi Redmi 9A to Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a clear step forward, and the improvements should be easy to notice.
Main improvements: performance, gaming, and camera.

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.53 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 720 x 1600 pixels 1440 x 3120 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 269 ppi 500 ppi
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 400 nits 1500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 2600 nits
HDR support No Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate - 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Armor 2
Screen-to-body ratio 81.1% 91.4%
Display features - - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 92.9% -
Response time 40 ms -
Contrast 1318:1 -
Screen space comparison
Galaxy S26 Ultra
6.9″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 18.1 in2
Redmi 9A
6.53″ (20:9 ratio) = 16 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
432 nits
2790 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 164.9 mm (6.49 inches) 163.6 mm (6.44 inches)
Width 77 mm (3.03 inches) 78.1 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 9 mm (0.35 inches) 7.9 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 194 g (6.84 oz) 214 g (7.55 oz)
Waterproof No IP68
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors Gray, Blue, Green White, Black, Silver, Blue, Pink, Purple
Fingerprint scanner No Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
81.1%
91.4%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi 9A and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Helio G25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 2000 MHz 4740 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.5 GHz: Cortex-A53
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A53
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache - 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 12 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) No Hexagon
GPU
Graphics IMG PowerVR GE8320 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 32 1536
GPU clock 650 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~41.8 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi 9A and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
472
3624
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1524
11049
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 28391
Single-core score 472 3624
Multi-core score 1524 11049
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
163723
3939244
CPU 77541 1168602
GPU 14691 1520337
Memory 29116 448779
UX 42375 801526
Total score 163723 3939244
Samples Less than 3 [32 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 67%
Graphics test - 20 FPS
Graphics score - 2737
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 46 FPS
Section 1 - 58 FPS
Section 2 - 42 FPS
Section 3 - 37 FPS
Graphics score - 11990
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test - 42 FPS
Graphics score - 7123
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 23390
Video editing - 8217
Photo editing - 37389
Data manipulation - 18322
Writing score - 32854

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi 9A
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-19 (Carlos)AnTuTu165673
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-05 (Pavel)AnTuTu3959848
📘 2026-08-29 -> szymon-bonkowskiAnTuTu4220521
📘 2026-08-25 (Edwin3q)AnTuTu3855646
📘 2026-08-13 (Jovan Čamagić)AnTuTu3848536
📘 2026-08-08 (Nan01)GeekBench CPU3569 / 10336

Memory

RAM
RAM size 2 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 1600 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 32 GB 256 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 256 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 10 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) Android 16
ROM MIUI 12.5 Enhanced One UI 8.5
OS size 11 GB 33.2 GB
OS updates - 7 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 10 W 60 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (25 W)
Reverse charging No Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging No Yes (84% in 30 min)
Full charging time 2:55 hr 0:43 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:08 hr 10:12 hr
Watching video 13:37 hr 21:39 hr
Gaming 05:37 hr 06:42 hr
Standby 118 hr 130 hr
General battery life
24:07 hr
28:50 hr

Main camera

Matrix 13 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 4128 x 3096 16320 x 12240
Zoom Digital Optical, 5x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording No Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 240FPS
Slow motion No 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens - 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 13 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 13 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.4
Focal length 28 mm 23 mm
Sensor - Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2
Sensor size - 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Digital Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.9
Focal length - 111 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX854
Sensor size - 1/2.52" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size - 0.7 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/1.9
Focal length - 13 mm
Sensor - Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3
Sensor size - 1/2.5" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size - 0.7 micron
Stabilization - Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 165
Zoom - 141
Samples - Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 5 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 2560 x 1960 4000 x 3000
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 23 mm
Sensor CMOS Samsung ISOCELL S5K3LU
Sensor size - 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 6.0
Bluetooth features LE, HID, A2DP LE
USB type Micro USB USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* No Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 4 -
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers Mono Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
76.5 dB
92 dB

Other

Category Budget Flagship
Announced June 2020 February 2026
Release date August 2020 March 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $100 $1299
Successor - Xiaomi Redmi 10A -
SAR (head) 0.398 W/kg 1.28 W/kg
SAR (body) 0.901 W/kg 1.35 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger - Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
42 (89.4%)
5 (10.6%)
Total votes: 47

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!